Calculating the center of mass as an astronaut moves on a shuttle

AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on calculating the center of mass shift of a space shuttle as an astronaut moves within it. The initial approach considered conservation of momentum, but the absence of initial conditions complicated the analysis. The correct method involves tracking the center of mass of the shuttle and the astronaut, recognizing that the system's center of mass remains fixed in space. The calculations confirm that the shuttle moves in response to the astronaut's movement to maintain the overall center of mass. Ultimately, understanding the relationship between internal forces and the center of mass is crucial for solving such problems.
ago01
Messages
46
Reaction score
8
Homework Statement
An astronaut with mass M_a moves across a rectangular space shuttle of length d. If the space shuttle has mass M_s, how far does the shuttle move back?
Relevant Equations
Center of mass.
I had solved this question but it didn't seem to be appropriate to post in the classical physics problem as my question is still homework-based.

Originally I had thought this might be a conservation of momentum problem. But since we don't have any initial conditions it leaves too much to guess. A simpler approach would be to track the center of mass of the space shuttle, and it's shift would correspond to the movement of the shuttle backwards.

Admittedly the homework question appears poorly worded but from what I deduced (based on getting the correct) answer, this is occurring in space.

The center of mass of the shuttle itself should be at ##\frac{d}{2}## but I thought this wasn't necessary to use. I figured I could track the center of mass at the origin (where the astronaut starts on the shuttle), and I arrived at:

##\frac{0M_s + dM_a}{M_s + M_d}##

which gave me the correct answer. But after reviewing my thought process I confused myself...since shouldn't I have needed to track the center of mass of the shuttle to track it's movement?

What does this result actually mean in terms of a center of mass shift? I am having trouble understanding it without thinking about the midpoint center of mass of the shuttle.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
It doesn't actually matter how you choose to distribute the mass inside the shuttle, because it moves as a rigid body. You can localise the mass ##M_{\mathrm{s}}## of the shuttle at a point initially located at starting position of the astronaut, if you like.
 
ago01 said:
Homework Statement:: An astronaut with mass M_a moves across a rectangular space shuttle of length d. If the space shuttle has mass M_s, how far does the shuttle move back?
Relevant Equations:: Center of mass.

I had solved this question but it didn't seem to be appropriate to post in the classical physics problem as my question is still homework-based.

Originally I had thought this might be a conservation of momentum problem. But since we don't have any initial conditions it leaves too much to guess. A simpler approach would be to track the center of mass of the space shuttle, and it's shift would correspond to the movement of the shuttle backwards.

Admittedly the homework question appears poorly worded but from what I deduced (based on getting the correct) answer, this is occurring in space.

The center of mass of the shuttle itself should be at ##\frac{d}{2}## but I thought this wasn't necessary to use. I figured I could track the center of mass at the origin (where the astronaut starts on the shuttle), and I arrived at:

##\frac{0M_s + dM_a}{M_s + M_d}##

which gave me the correct answer. But after reviewing my thought process I confused myself...since shouldn't I have needed to track the center of mass of the shuttle to track it's movement?

What does this result actually mean in terms of a center of mass shift? I am having trouble understanding it without thinking about the midpoint center of mass of the shuttle.
Conservation of momentum implies the common mass centre does not move.
If the astronaut's mass moves distance x in one direction then how far does the shuttle move in the opposite direction?
 
It's not clear what your thought process was in getting your answer (or why you think the center of mass of the shuttle wasn't used). Do it step by step. Imagine the astronaut moving left to right across the shuttle. With respect to the center of the shuttle, where is the center of mass when the astronaut (1) begins his walk and (2) completes his walk? Since the center of mass of the system is fixed, how much did the shuttle have to move?
 
ago01 said:
The center of mass of the shuttle itself should be at ##\frac{d}{2}## but I thought this wasn't necessary to use. I figured I could track the center of mass at the origin (where the astronaut starts on the shuttle), and I arrived at:

##\frac{0M_s + dM_a}{M_s + M_d}##

which gave me the correct answer.

Yep. That should work fine. :smile:

Your idea that fixing the center of mass of the shuttle to be at \frac{d}{2} is unnecessary is correct. As @ergospherical points out, you can choose the center of mass of the shuttle to be at any point you like. You could choose it such that it is at \frac{d}{2}, but you don't have to. Your choice of placing it at the origin, along with the initial location of the astronaut, is just fine.

All that's necessary is that once you pick a mass distribution for the shuttle, stick with it through the end of the problem.

ago01 said:
But after reviewing my thought process I confused myself...since shouldn't I have needed to track the center of mass of the shuttle to track it's movement?

I assume you did. That's the answer to the problem. The movement of the center of mass of the shuttle is what you are being asked to find. That's the final answer.

ago01 said:
What does this result actually mean in terms of a center of mass shift? I am having trouble understanding it without thinking about the midpoint center of mass of the shuttle.

If it helps to wrap your brain around this problem, realize that there are three "movements" (measured in distance) that are of concern:
  • The distance the astronaut moves (relative to the center of mass of the system)
  • The distance the shuttle moves (relative to the center of mass of the system)
  • The distance the center of mass of the system moves, which is zero. This is the only thing which does not move.

Of course, the distance that the shuttle moves (with respect to the center of mass of the system) is the final answer.

The tricky bit to this problem is realizing out how far the astronaut moves, relative to the center of mass of the system (hint: it's not d).
 
Doc Al said:
It's not clear what your thought process was in getting your answer (or why you think the center of mass of the shuttle wasn't used). Do it step by step. Imagine the astronaut moving left to right across the shuttle. With respect to the center of the shuttle, where is the center of mass when the astronaut (1) begins his walk and (2) completes his walk? Since the center of mass of the system is fixed, how much did the shuttle have to move?

collinsmark said:
I assume you did. That's the answer to the problem. The movement of the center of mass of the shuttle is what you are being asked to find. That's the final answer.
I'm sorry I wasn't clear. To be honest there wasn't much thought process to it... if I'm being honest it was a plug and chug fluke. I'm asking because I'm embarrassed about it being correct.

Walking through your example shows my problem clearly. I am having trouble separating not treating the two separately and instead treating them like a system.

If I just push through it mathematically:

Letting the left side of the shuttle be ##A## and right side be ##B##. Positive x to the right. Astronaut starts at ##A## and goes to ##B##.

If we let the CM of the shuttle be at the center initially as well as the origin, then the system's center of mass initially is:

##\frac{-\frac{d}{2} + 0m_s}{m_a+m_s}##

So the center of mass will sit somewhere between the CM of the shuttle and where the astronaut is standing.

If we look at the final position:

##\frac{\frac{d}{2} + 0m_s}{m_a+m_s}##

Which once again will have the CM sitting between the astronaut and the CM of the shuttle.

So the difference between final and initial gives us

##\frac{\frac{d}{2} + 0m_s}{m_a+m_s} - \frac{-\frac{d}{2} + 0m_s}{m_a+m_s}##

Which is the same answer as I had stumbled upon wrongly. This ends up being reconciled by realizing that without the presence of external force the center of mass doesn't move. Since all the forces of the astronaut pushing against the space shuttle and the shuttle against the astronaut are internal in the shuttle-astronaut system the only way to come to this conclusion is that this difference is exactly the shuttle moving. My problem really came from the OpenStax book I am using not really covering the center of mass not moving in the center of mass section (it was touched on in detail but this detail appears to be left out and instead implied during the discussion of momentum).

When viewed from the origin it appears that the shuttle does not move (indicated by the ##0m_s## in both places), but when viewed from the outside the shuttle moves in order to keep the center of mass from moving. The difficulty in accepting the result is probably because internal forces can't change momentum (you can't lift yourself up by pulling on your feet), but in this system two components are moving but when taken together the system has no momentum and the center of mass of the system doesn't move.

By lining up the two on graph paper I can see the astronaut doesn't actually cover ##d## if the center of mass is to stay equal. I haven't taken a stab at it, but I would suppose that even though he's at ##B## he's covered less than ##d## because for some portion of his movement the shuttle is moving against him. So possibly ##d - d_{cm}## as a first pass where ##d_{cm}## represents the shuttles negative movement.

I'm actually embarrassed at such a "simple" explanation (assuming I am correct) completely alluding me. Physics is a mind-bender. We essentially look at the center of mass of a system based on the centers of mass of it's parts and their distance from the origin (since we can treat the center of mass of each as a "representation" of the place the forces act on an object).
 
Last edited:
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'Collision of a bullet on a rod-string system: query'
In this question, I have a question. I am NOT trying to solve it, but it is just a conceptual question. Consider the point on the rod, which connects the string and the rod. My question: just before and after the collision, is ANGULAR momentum CONSERVED about this point? Lets call the point which connects the string and rod as P. Why am I asking this? : it is clear from the scenario that the point of concern, which connects the string and the rod, moves in a circular path due to the string...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top