How to find the center of mass of a cube?

Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around finding the center of mass of a homogeneous solid cube with side length L, focusing on the analytical approach in three dimensions.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Mathematical reasoning, Problem interpretation

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • The original poster attempts to understand how to find the center of mass in three dimensions, noting that for a homogeneous cube centered at the origin, the center of mass would be at (0,0,0). They seek clarification on the analytical method to achieve this.
  • Some participants suggest considering the two-dimensional case as a stepping stone to extend the reasoning to three dimensions, discussing the calculation of the center of mass using integrals for both x and y components.
  • There is a proposal to apply similar calculations for the z dimension, using one corner of the cube as a reference point.
  • Questions arise regarding whether the calculations for the z dimension would yield the same result as for the x and y dimensions.

Discussion Status

The discussion is ongoing, with participants exploring different approaches and confirming the consistency of the calculations across dimensions. Some guidance has been provided on how to extend the two-dimensional method to three dimensions, but no consensus has been reached on the final presentation of the solution.

Contextual Notes

Participants are working within the constraints of a homework assignment, focusing on analytical methods without providing complete solutions. There is an emphasis on understanding the reasoning behind the calculations rather than simply arriving at an answer.

Davidllerenav
Messages
424
Reaction score
14

Homework Statement


Find the center of mass of a homogeneous solid cube with side ##L## analytically.

Homework Equations


None.

The Attempt at a Solution


I don't understand how to find the center of mass on three dimensions. I know that since it is homogeneous, if I center the cube on the origin, then the center of mass would be on ##(0,0,0)##, but how do I find this analytically?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
How would you do it in two dimensions? If you think about the technique you use in that case, it should become apparent how you might extend that to three dimensions.
 
andrewkirk said:
How would you do it in two dimensions? If you think about the technique you use in that case, it should become apparent how you might extend that to three dimensions.
In two dimensions I would no center it at the origin, I use ##(0,0)## as one of the corners of the square, then I would find the ##x## component by ##X_{cm}=\frac{\int\sigma x dA}{\int\sigma dA}## and the ##y## component by ##Y_{cm}=\frac{\int\sigma y dA}{\int\sigma dA}##. So ##X_{cm}=\frac{\int_{0}^L Lxdx }{\int_{0}^L Ldx}=\frac{L\int_{0}^L xdx}{L\int_{0}^L dx}=\frac{\frac{x^2}{2}}{L}=\frac{L}{2}##, the same would be for ##y##, so ##Y_{cm}=\frac{\int_{0}^L Lydy }{\int_{0}^L Ldy}=\frac{L\int_{0}^L ydy}{L\int_{0}^L dy}=\frac{\frac{y^2}{2}}{L}=\frac{L}{2}##, so the center of mass would be on the point ##\left(\frac{L}{2},\frac{L}{2}\right)##. How should I do this with three dimensions?
 
Just do the same calculation for the z dimension as you did for the x and y dimensions, using (0,0,0) as one of the corners of the cube, the cube lying entirely in the first octant of the space (all three coordinates positive) and with each edge of the cube parallel to one of the three axes.
 
andrewkirk said:
Just do the same calculation for the z dimension as you did for the x and y dimensions, using (0,0,0) as one of the corners of the cube, the cube lying entirely in the first octant of the space (all three coordinates positive) and with each edge of the cube parallel to one of the three axes.
So I would end up with ##L/2## again? Would be something like ##Z_{cm}=\frac{\int_{0}^L Lzdz }{\int_{0}^L Ldz}=\frac{L\int_{0}^L ydz}{L\int_{0}^L dz}=\frac{\frac{z^2}{2}}{L}=\frac{L}{2}##? Or would something change?
 
Davidllerenav said:
So I would end up with ##L/2## again? Would be something like ##Z_{cm}=\frac{\int_{0}^L Lzdz }{\int_{0}^L Ldz}=\frac{L\int_{0}^L ydz}{L\int_{0}^L dz}=\frac{\frac{z^2}{2}}{L}=\frac{L}{2}##? Or would something change?
Yes, you'd end up with that. Nothing would change.
 
andrewkirk said:
Yes, you'd end up with that. Nothing would change.
Ok. Then the aswer would be just to write thos three calculations and that's it?
 

Similar threads

Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 25 ·
Replies
25
Views
2K
  • · Replies 19 ·
Replies
19
Views
4K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
3K