Calculating the coefficient of friction of a car going down a ramp

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The forum discussion focuses on calculating the coefficient of friction for a Hot Wheels car rolling down a 1-meter ramp at varying angles. The recorded times resulted in negative coefficients of friction, indicating a fundamental misunderstanding of the physics involved. The key issue arises from the concept of "rolling without slipping," where friction does not oppose motion but instead facilitates it. To accurately measure coefficients of friction, the experiment should utilize sliding objects rather than rolling ones, as the current setup is inadequate for this purpose.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of Newton's laws of motion
  • Familiarity with the concept of rolling without slipping
  • Basic knowledge of trigonometry and its application in physics
  • Experience with experimental design in physics labs
NEXT STEPS
  • Investigate the principles of rolling without slipping in detail
  • Learn about the differences between kinetic and static friction
  • Explore alternative experimental setups for measuring coefficients of friction
  • Research the use of inclined planes in physics experiments
USEFUL FOR

Physics educators, students conducting experiments on friction, and anyone interested in understanding the dynamics of rolling objects on inclined surfaces.

rhufeo
Messages
2
Reaction score
0
I designed this lab for my physics class where we roll a hot wheels car down a length of wood that measured 1 m long. we did this process three times at varying angles and we want to investigate how changing the angle affects the coefficient of friction. The problem is, the times that we recorded end up giving us negative coefficients of friction! Whats our problem?!

For example. we recorded that at 20 degrees, the car took 0.75 seconds to travel the 1 m of wood. Using the calculations we get this:

1 m = 1/2(acceleration)(0.75 seconds)^2
a = 3.56 m/s^2

coefficient of friction = (((9.8 m/s^2)(sin20))-3.56 m/s^2) / ((9.8)(cos 20))
coefficient of friction = -0.0226


help please!
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Well, we have a problem here. The predicted acceleration in the absence of friction is indeed 9.8sin20 = 3.35 m/s^2, which is LESS than the empirically obtained acceleration which occurred in the presence of friction.
 
So how should i fix this? The lab is supposed to investigate the properties of friction.
 
I could be way off here, because it's been a while since I looked at "rolling without slipping", but that's probably what's occurring here (look it up). So, maybe you really need to re-evaluate your experiment. Is friction even opposing the motion of the cars? I would say no, because two surfaces are NOT sliding relative to each other. On the contrary, there is enough friction to prevent any sliding between the wheels and the ramp (hence "without slipping" -- the wheels maintain traction). Instead, at every instant, the wheel "pivots" around the point on its circumference that can be can be considered to be in contact with the ramp, and that propels it forward. So there is in fact a forward pointing friction force in this situation. I hope somebody else who has a better handle on rolling without slipping can comment and explain the situation more clearly. If what I'm thinking is true, then using rolling cars is not a good choice for an experiment that's designed to use sliding objects on a ramp to calculate coefficients of friction.
 
Which angle are you specifying- relative to the horizontal or the vertical?
 
rhufeo said:
So how should i fix this? The lab is supposed to investigate the properties of friction.

For rolling objects downhill, the acceleration works out to be ~ g times tan theta (for small angles). For an angle of 20 degres that will be 9.8 x .36397 = 3.56 which is exactly what you recorded. As cepheid has already pointed out, the setup you are using is not very useful for measuring coefficients of kinetic friction. What you might do is change the name of your project, and demonstrate rolling acceleration, or you might consider using some sort of ski-like object to slide down the incline.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
5K
Replies
15
Views
3K
  • · Replies 59 ·
2
Replies
59
Views
4K
  • · Replies 17 ·
Replies
17
Views
3K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
10K
Replies
18
Views
3K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
3K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
1K
  • · Replies 35 ·
2
Replies
35
Views
4K