Calculating the definition of a derivative: 2^x

Click For Summary
To find the derivative of 2^x using the definition, start with the limit expression dy/dx = lim (h->0) [(2^(x+h) - 2^x)/h]. This simplifies to dy/dx = 2^x * lim (h->0) [(2^h - 1)/h]. Understanding that 2^h can be expressed as e^(h log 2) is crucial, as it allows the use of the known limit lim (h->0) [(e^h - 1)/h] = 1. The derivative ultimately results in dy/dx = 2^x * ln(2), showing that the derivative of 2^x is proportional to 2^x itself, multiplied by the natural logarithm of 2. Mastery of these concepts is essential for successfully calculating derivatives of exponential functions.
Potatochip911
Messages
317
Reaction score
3

Homework Statement


[/B]
I'm supposed to find the derivative of 2^x using the definition of a derivative. I am really confused as to how I can factor out the h.

Homework Equations


y=2^x

The Attempt at a Solution


limit as h->0 in all of these, I don't want to write it out because it's going to look even worse (didn't want to learn latex right this moment).
dy/dx=(2^(x+h)-2^x)/h
dy/dx=(2^x*(2^h-1))/h
This is as far as I got and I'm not even sure if it was useful to factor out 2^x
Hopefully there is a rule for exponents that I'm not aware of that can be used for this.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Use the fact that ##2^h = e^{h \log 2}## (where ##\log## is the natural log).

I guess you need to know some other stuff as well. Without knowing what you're allowed to use, it's hard to give you advice. Do you know the derivative of ##e^x## for example? Or the following limit?
$$\lim_{h\to 0}\frac{e^h - 1}h = 1$$
 
Honestly I'm not entirely sure what I'm allowed to use, we went over the proof for the derivative of e but we were told that we wouldn't need to know it, this question is from a previous year so maybe that year the curriculum was different? I know how to derive e^x using the chain rule but I'm not sure how I could incorporate that into my limit.
 
Potatochip911 said:
Honestly I'm not entirely sure what I'm allowed to use.
Well, that's one thing you'll need to figure out.

We went over the proof for the derivative of e but we were told that we wouldn't need to know it, this question is from a previous year so maybe that year the curriculum was different?
You can solve this problem pretty easily if you can use the fact that the derivative of ##e^x## is ##e^x##. You don't need to know how to prove it.

I know how to derive e^x using the chain rule but I'm not sure how I could incorporate that into my limit.
I think you mean you know how to differentiate ##e^x##. Derive doesn't mean "find the derivative of."
 
"Using the definition of a derivative" means using the difference quotient:
\frac{df}{dx}= \lim_{h\to 0} \frac{f(x+ h)- f(x)}{h}

\frac{2^{x+h}- 2^x}{h}= \frac{2^x(2^h)- 2^x}{h}= 2^x \frac{2^h- 1}{h}

So \frac{d 2^x}{dx}= 2^x\left(\lim_{h\to 0} \frac{2^h- 1}{h}\right)
That is obviously 2^x times a constant. How to find that constant, and if you can, depends on what other knowledge you have.
(2^x= e^{ln(2^x)}= e^{x ln(2)} so if you know how to differentiate e^x you can show that constant is ln(2).)
 
Question: A clock's minute hand has length 4 and its hour hand has length 3. What is the distance between the tips at the moment when it is increasing most rapidly?(Putnam Exam Question) Answer: Making assumption that both the hands moves at constant angular velocities, the answer is ## \sqrt{7} .## But don't you think this assumption is somewhat doubtful and wrong?

Similar threads

  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
1K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
1K
  • · Replies 20 ·
Replies
20
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
1K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 25 ·
Replies
25
Views
2K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
1K