MHB Calculating the Height of an Isosceles Triangle Using Coordinates and Equations

  • Thread starter Thread starter Wilmer
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Triangle
Click For Summary
The discussion focuses on calculating the height of an isosceles triangle ABC with given coordinates and dimensions. The triangle has equal sides AB and AC, a base BC of 112, and specific points D and E defined on AC and height line AH, respectively. Two methods are presented for finding the height AH, both leading to quartic equations, with the first method yielding a height of 63 and the second method resulting in a height of 105. Participants express a desire for a simpler solution despite the complexity of the calculations involved. The discussion highlights the challenges of solving geometric problems using algebraic methods.
Wilmer
Messages
303
Reaction score
0
Code:
                    A

              (51)
                                      
           D
                          
                    E
     
                  (42)        

C        (56)       H       (56)       B
Isosceles triangle ABC, AB = AC, base BC = 112.
D is on AC: line BD crosses height line AH at E.
Results in AD = 51 and EH = 42.
What is the length of height line AH?
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
Wilmer said:
Code:
                    A

              (51)
                                      
           D
                          
                    E
     
                  (42)        

C        (56)       H       (56)       B
Isosceles triangle ABC, AB = AC, base BC = 112.
D is on AC: line BD crosses height line AH at E.
Results in AD = 51 and EH = 42.
What is the length of height line AH?

Hi wilmer, :)

Let, \(AE=x\mbox{ and }\angle ADE=\theta\). Using the Pythagorean law for triangle \(ACH\) we get,

\[CD=\sqrt{(x+42)^2+56^2}-51~~~~~~~~(1)\]

Using the law of sines on the triangle \(ADE\) you will get,

\[\sin\theta=\frac{56x}{3570}~~~~~~~~~~~(2)\]

Using the law of sines on the triangle \(BCD\) and using (1) and (2) you will get,

\[x\left(\sqrt{(x+42)^2+56^2}-51\right)=4284+51x\]

Squaring this equation will give you a Quartic equation which has only one positive real solution. I used Maxima to get the answer,

\[x=63\]

This method may not be the most economical way of doing this problem and I would be delighted to see a more elegant method. :)

Kind Regards,
Sudharaka.
 
Thanks, Mr, Sud; I agree; but you've been of no help (Smile)
I had solved it (also with a darn Quartic!) and was sneakily trying
to see if someone could come up with something "simpler".

Since I hate using SIN or COS, I placed CB on x-axis with C at origin;
let h = AH, so A(56,h).

Letting (x,y) = D's coordinates, I used following equations:
BD's y-intercept is clearly 84; hence BD's equation is: y = (-3/4)x + 84
AC's equation is easier still, with points (0,0) and (56,h) : y = (h/56)x

So I needed to solve:
(56 - x)^2 + (h - y)^2 = 51^2

Getting x and y in terms of h:
x = 4704 / (h + 42)
y = 84h / (h + 42)

And that leads to MY(!) quartic:
h^4 - 84h^3 + 2299h^2 - 481908h + 943740 = 0 (hope it's better than yours)(Thinking)
Which has h = 105 as only "valid" solution (so AE = 63)

And that checks out ok. Makes the equal sides AB and AC = 119 ; also DE = 30.

Surprising to me that this is not easier, with right triangles all over the place!
 
Seemingly by some mathematical coincidence, a hexagon of sides 2,2,7,7, 11, and 11 can be inscribed in a circle of radius 7. The other day I saw a math problem on line, which they said came from a Polish Olympiad, where you compute the length x of the 3rd side which is the same as the radius, so that the sides of length 2,x, and 11 are inscribed on the arc of a semi-circle. The law of cosines applied twice gives the answer for x of exactly 7, but the arithmetic is so complex that the...

Similar threads