MHB Calculating the Length of an Angle Bisector: Is My Solution Correct?

  • Thread starter Thread starter divisor
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Angle Length
divisor
Messages
2
Reaction score
0
How to find the length of an angle bisector ($$BK$$) in a triangle $$A(1;4), B(7;8), C(9;2)$$.

I calc $$BK$$:
[math]\frac{x-7}{\frac{1+\frac{\sqrt{13}}{\sqrt{10}} \cdot 9}{1+\frac{\sqrt{13}}{\sqrt{10}}} - 7} - \frac{y-8}{\frac{4+\frac{\sqrt{13}}{\sqrt{10}} \cdot 2}{1+\frac{\sqrt{13}}{\sqrt{10}}} - 8}=0[/math]

Is it right?
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
Welcome, divisor! (Wave)

Is the equation you wrote supposed to be the equation of line containing $BK$? I haven't checked it for correctness, but you usually find lengths in the coordinate plane using the distance formula. Since $BK$ is an angle bisector of $\triangle ABC$, the angle bisector theorem gives $\frac{AK}{KC} = \frac{AB}{AC}$. Find $AB$ and $AC$ using the distance formula. Next, use the equation in Stewart's theorem to solve for $BK$.
 
Euge, thank you. I want to check my solution by Stewart's theorem.
 
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...
Fermat's Last Theorem has long been one of the most famous mathematical problems, and is now one of the most famous theorems. It simply states that the equation $$ a^n+b^n=c^n $$ has no solutions with positive integers if ##n>2.## It was named after Pierre de Fermat (1607-1665). The problem itself stems from the book Arithmetica by Diophantus of Alexandria. It gained popularity because Fermat noted in his copy "Cubum autem in duos cubos, aut quadratoquadratum in duos quadratoquadratos, et...
Thread 'Imaginary Pythagorus'
I posted this in the Lame Math thread, but it's got me thinking. Is there any validity to this? Or is it really just a mathematical trick? Naively, I see that i2 + plus 12 does equal zero2. But does this have a meaning? I know one can treat the imaginary number line as just another axis like the reals, but does that mean this does represent a triangle in the complex plane with a hypotenuse of length zero? Ibix offered a rendering of the diagram using what I assume is matrix* notation...
Back
Top