MHB Calculating the length of an arc inside a circle

AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on calculating the length of an arc within an equilateral triangle for a CAD modeling project. The user seeks to determine the arc's dimensions based on a given distance of 5 inches from the triangle's apex to the midpoint of the arc. A suggested approach involves defining the ratio of the radii of the circles forming the arcs or specifying the angle of the arcs, with a 60-degree angle proposed for simplicity. The conversation also touches on the user's intuition regarding the arc angle and its geometric reasoning. Overall, the thread emphasizes practical methods for accurately modeling the shape using CAD software.
Aja
Messages
4
Reaction score
0
A sad and strange image, I know, but better than none at all. What you see is a stake I'm trying to model using CAD software. With the dimension given (5 inches--in case it's not clear, the distance from the top of the equilateral triangle that encloses this shape to the midpoint of the red arc) I'm willing to bet that I can calculate the length of that arc or other dimensions that will help me model this accurately.

Any ideas?

https://www.physicsforums.com/attachments/4116
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
Aja said:
A sad and strange image, I know, but better than none at all. What you see is a stake I'm trying to model using CAD software. With the dimension given (5 inches--in case it's not clear, the distance from the top of the equilateral triangle that encloses this shape to the midpoint of the red arc) I'm willing to bet that I can calculate the length of that arc or other dimensions that will help me model this accurately.

Any ideas?
Hi Aja, and welcome to MHB!

It looks as though the shape you are trying to model is a region inside an equilateral triangle, where the boundary of the region consists of arcs of circles. There is a small circle, of radius $r_2$ say, inside each corner of the triangle, and arcs of these circles are connected by arcs of larger circles of radius $r_1$, as in the diagram below.

In order to determine the configuration, you need to know the ratio between those two radii. Alternatively, you could specify the angle of the $r_1$-arcs. In the diagram, I have made this angle $60^\circ$, which makes the calculations a whole lot easier.

In practice, it is probably easiest to start by deciding an arbitrary value for $r_2$. You can then use the ratio $r_1/r_2$ (or alternatively the angle of the $r_1$-arcs) to complete the construction. Then finally you can scale the whole diagram so that the vertical distance from the apex of the triangle to the midpoint of the $r_1$-arc at the base of the diagram becomes $5$ inches.

 

Attachments

  • stake.png
    stake.png
    7 KB · Views: 113
Thanks! I think you've led me to a solution that won't require any calculations or further measurements. How'd you create that nifty diagram?

Just for kicks, how would I go about solving this if I knew the ratio?

One other thing: would you say it's reasonable to assume that the arc angle is 60$^\circ$? That makes intuitive sense to me both given this object's shape and my fuzzy recollection of high school geometry, but I can't articulate why. Give me a nudge?
 
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...
Fermat's Last Theorem has long been one of the most famous mathematical problems, and is now one of the most famous theorems. It simply states that the equation $$ a^n+b^n=c^n $$ has no solutions with positive integers if ##n>2.## It was named after Pierre de Fermat (1607-1665). The problem itself stems from the book Arithmetica by Diophantus of Alexandria. It gained popularity because Fermat noted in his copy "Cubum autem in duos cubos, aut quadratoquadratum in duos quadratoquadratos, et...
Thread 'Imaginary Pythagorus'
I posted this in the Lame Math thread, but it's got me thinking. Is there any validity to this? Or is it really just a mathematical trick? Naively, I see that i2 + plus 12 does equal zero2. But does this have a meaning? I know one can treat the imaginary number line as just another axis like the reals, but does that mean this does represent a triangle in the complex plane with a hypotenuse of length zero? Ibix offered a rendering of the diagram using what I assume is matrix* notation...
Back
Top