Calculating the Lorentz Force of an Electron in Magnetic Field

Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around calculating the Lorentz force acting on an electron moving in a uniform magnetic field. The scenario involves an electron with a specific charge and mass, moving at an angle with a given speed in a magnetic field parallel to the x-axis.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Conceptual clarification, Mathematical reasoning

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants discuss the formula for the Lorentz force and the correct use of trigonometric functions in the context of the force calculation. There is also exploration of the relationship between mass and the force, particularly in relation to acceleration and circular motion.

Discussion Status

Participants are actively engaging with the problem, questioning assumptions about the force calculation and discussing the components of motion involved. Some guidance has been offered regarding the decomposition of velocity into parallel and perpendicular components relative to the magnetic field.

Contextual Notes

There is a mention of the need for clarity on the relationship between force, mass, and acceleration, as well as the implications of circular motion in the context of the problem. The discussion reflects a mix of understanding and uncertainty regarding the application of relevant physics principles.

willydavidjr
Messages
66
Reaction score
0
A diagram I attached (you can view the website) shows a uniform magnetic field of magnetic flux density B[Wb/m^2] parallel to the x-axis. On the xy-plane, an electron of electric charge -e[C] and mass m[kg] departed from the x-axis in the direction of [tex]\theta[/tex][rad] with a speed of v[m/s]. Then the electron carried out a spiral movement on a cylinder whose side contains the x-axis.

This is the question: What is the magnitude of the Lorentz force acting on the electron?

My idea: F=qvBcos[tex]\theta[/tex]
so the magnitude of the force is:
F=(-e)(v)(B)cos[tex]\theta[/tex]

Am I correct?
What would be the relationship of the mass on this question?

This is the website: www.geocities.com/willydavidjr/emf.html
 
Physics news on Phys.org
willydavidjr said:
A diagram I attached (you can view the website) shows a uniform magnetic field of magnetic flux density B[Wb/m^2] parallel to the x-axis. On the xy-plane, an electron of electric charge -e[C] and mass m[kg] departed from the x-axis in the direction of [tex]\theta[/tex][rad] with a speed of v[m/s]. Then the electron carried out a spiral movement on a cylinder whose side contains the x-axis.

This is the question: What is the magnitude of the Lorentz force acting on the electron?

My idea: F=qvBcos[tex]\theta[/tex]
so the magnitude of the force is:
F=(-e)(v)(B)cos[tex]\theta[/tex]

Am I correct?
Almost... it's [itex]sin(\theta)[/itex] (remember, it's a cross product)
What would be the relationship of the mass on this question?

This is the website: www.geocities.com/willydavidjr/emf.html
I am not sure what you mean here...The mass does not enter the calculation of the force. If you woulsd then calculate the *acceleration* then the mass would enter, following Newton's second law.
 
I see. I was wrong with the cosine instead of sine. I found out also that if we will calculate the radius of the circle, we will need the Newtons law of motion together with the formula of magnetic force.

This is the last question: Find he time between the electron leaving its starting point and returning to the x-axis again. Let phi denote the circular constant.
 
willydavidjr said:
My idea: F=qvBcos[tex]\theta[/tex]
so the magnitude of the force is:
F=(-e)(v)(B)cos[tex]\theta[/tex]

Be sure that you keep in mind the sings here. You are using vectors ! As has been stated before the cosine should be a sine.

To get the circular motion : do you know how to acquire the equation for the orbit (the path) if you know the force ? Since, you already know what this orbit is, i suggest you look at the formula's that caracterize a circular motion. Do you know these ?

marlon
 
I don't have any idea about the orbit but I know the magnetic force. Can you give me details on how to get this one?Thank you!
 
willydavidjr said:
I don't have any idea about the orbit but I know the magnetic force. Can you give me details on how to get this one?Thank you!
The motion is a sum of a motion at constant velocity in the same direction as the B field plus a circular motion at constant speed in the plane perpendicular to the B field.

So you must decompose the initial velocity in a component parallel to the B field, v_par and a component perpendicular, v_perp. For the perpendicular component just apply [itex]m {v_{perp}^2 \over r} = |q| v B sin \theta = |q| v_{perp} B[/itex] since "v sin(theta)" is the component of the velocity perpendicular to the B field (at the condition that theta is the angle between the B field and the velocity vector). Using this you can find the radius of the circle. Not only that but you can find how long it takes to complete a circle which is just the period of circular motion, [itex]T = {2 \pi r \over v_{perp}}[/itex] (of course, by that time the charge will have move along the x-axis so it won't get back to its initial position, it willhave moved a distance [itex]v_{par} T[/itex])
 
Your formula for the perpendicular component [tex]m \frac {v_perp}{r}[/tex] doesn't match with mass x acceleration. How is that so?
 
willydavidjr said:
Your formula for the perpendicular component [tex]m \frac {v_perp}{r}[/tex] doesn't match with mass x acceleration. How is that so?
The equation I entered was
[tex]m { v_{perp}^2 \over r}[/tex]
(as you can check by left clicking on my equation to see the Latex code). It's just that the exponent "2" is so small that it is hard to see (I should have used tex anchors instead of itex anchors).

Patrick
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
2K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
2K
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K