A Calculating the optical depth of an inhomogeous gas

AI Thread Summary
To calculate the optical depth of an inhomogeneous gas cloud, it is essential to consider the varying density of the gas throughout the cloud rather than using a constant density. The integral should be expressed as τ = ∫(ρ(r)/ρ̄)α(r) dr, where ρ(r) is the local density, ρ̄ is the average density, and α(r) is the linear attenuation coefficient. A small cutoff radius can be introduced to avoid issues with diverging density at r = 0. This method will yield a unitless optical depth, aligning with the physical requirements of the problem. Properly accounting for these factors will lead to a more accurate calculation of the optical depth for the gas cloud.
colorofeternity
Messages
2
Reaction score
0
TL;DR Summary
Trying to find the required integral to calculate the optical depth for a cloud with a mass density that follows the inverse square law with a finite density at the center.
My question emerges from my desire to calculate the optical depth, which should be unitless, for an inhomgeneous cloud of radius ##r##. For a homogeneous medium, the optical depth can be defined in terms of the density of a cloud relative to the density of the condensed medium:

$$\tau = \alpha \frac{\rho}{\rho_c}l$$

Where ##\alpha## is the linear attenuation coefficient of light at a given wavelength for the material in question, ##\rho## is the density of the cloud and ##\rho_c## is the mass density of the condensed phase (assuming the cloud is all made of one material, lets say Iron). #l# is the path length of light through the cloud.
This form is used when the linear attenuation coefficient of the gaseous form of the material is unknown, as it is for many metallic gases. What I wish to do is calculate the optical depth for light passing through the spherical cloud of radius, ##r_0## given that the mass density of the cloud follows the inverse-square law with a finite mass density at ##r = 0##, ##\rho_0## (##kg/m^3##).
My attempt at the required integral is as follows:

$$\tau = \int_{0}^{r_0} \frac{\rho_0}{r^2} dr$$

However, I am unsure about this as this expression would give a diverging density at ##r = 0##, which isn't what is happening physically. If I add in an extra ##r^2## term as would be the case for spherical coordinates, then I would end up with a path length of ##r_0##, which seems odd. In addition, it seems that the units don't fully add up as I would expect ##\tau## to be unitless.

How should I approach this problem?
 
Science news on Phys.org


To calculate the optical depth for an inhomogeneous gas, you can use a similar approach as for a homogeneous medium, but instead of using the density of the cloud relative to the density of the condensed medium, you can use the density of the gas at a given point relative to the average gas density. This will give you a unitless optical depth that takes into account the varying density of the gas throughout the cloud.

The integral you have attempted is not correct as it does not take into account the varying density of the gas. Instead, you can use the following expression:

$$\tau = \int_{0}^{r_0} \frac{\rho(r)}{\bar{\rho}} \alpha(r) dr$$

Where ##\rho(r)## is the density of the gas at a given point, ##\bar{\rho}## is the average gas density, and ##\alpha(r)## is the linear attenuation coefficient at that point. This integral will give you the optical depth for light passing through the spherical cloud.

To address the issue of the diverging density at ##r = 0##, you can use a small cutoff radius, ##r_{min}##, and integrate from that radius instead of from ##r = 0##. This will prevent the density from becoming infinite and will still give you a good approximation of the optical depth.

In terms of units, the integral will give you a unitless optical depth, as desired. However, the linear attenuation coefficient, ##\alpha##, will have units of ##m^{-1}##. You can convert this to a unitless coefficient by dividing by the path length, ##l##, giving you a unitless attenuation coefficient, ##\alpha/l##. This can then be used in the integral to calculate the optical depth.

Overall, the key is to take into account the varying density of the gas throughout the cloud and to use a cutoff radius to prevent any diverging values. This approach will give you a more accurate and physically meaningful calculation of the optical depth for an inhomogeneous gas cloud.
 
Thread 'A quartet of epi-illumination methods'
Well, it took almost 20 years (!!!), but I finally obtained a set of epi-phase microscope objectives (Zeiss). The principles of epi-phase contrast is nearly identical to transillumination phase contrast, but the phase ring is a 1/8 wave retarder rather than a 1/4 wave retarder (because with epi-illumination, the light passes through the ring twice). This method was popular only for a very short period of time before epi-DIC (differential interference contrast) became widely available. So...
Hello ! As we know by definition that: "Constructive interference occurs when the phase difference between the waves is an even multiple of π (180°), whereas destructive interference occurs when the difference is an odd multiple of π." But my question is in the case of destructive interference, what happens to the energy carried by the two electromagnetic waves that annihilate, the energy carried by the electromagnetic waves also disappears, or is transformed into some other type of...
I am currently undertaking a research internship where I am modelling the heating of silicon wafers with a 515 nm femtosecond laser. In order to increase the absorption of the laser into the oxide layer on top of the wafer it was suggested we use gold nanoparticles. I was tasked with modelling the optical properties of a 5nm gold nanoparticle, in particular the absorption cross section, using COMSOL Multiphysics. My model seems to be getting correct values for the absorption coefficient and...
Back
Top