Calculating the Power Needed to Bike Up a Hill

  • Thread starter Thread starter Jimbo57
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Bike Hill Power
AI Thread Summary
To calculate the power needed for an 85 kg man to bike 850m up a 5.2° incline at a constant speed of 15.6 m/s, the total force required to overcome gravity and friction is determined to be 250.497N. This force includes a frictional component of 175N and the gravitational force calculated using mgsinθ. The power is then calculated by multiplying the total force by the velocity, resulting in 3900W. The discussion emphasizes the importance of understanding the reasoning behind calculations to improve problem-solving skills in physics. This approach not only aids in academic performance but also develops a critical skill for tackling unknown problems in the future.
Jimbo57
Messages
96
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


What power must a man of mass 85 kg have to bicycle 850m up a hill, inclined at 5.2° to the horizontal, at a constant speed of 15.6m/s? The force of friction on the man and the bicycle is 175N parallel to the incline.

Homework Equations


The Attempt at a Solution



m= 85kg
g=9.8m/ss
v=15.6m/s
θ= 5.2°

F = 175N + mgsinθ
= 175N + 75.497N Here I'm determining the forces required to overcome gravity and friction.
= 250.497N

P = F*v
= 250.497N * 15.6m/s Here I took the calculated force and the velocity and determined the power.
= 3900W

How does it look?
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
The way to work out if you have done well is to write out the reasoning that lead you to this calculation. It also makes it easier for an examiner to mark your work, which contributes to your ability to get a higher grade :)
 
Simon Bridge said:
The way to work out if you have done well is to write out the reasoning that lead you to this calculation. It also makes it easier for an examiner to mark your work, which contributes to your ability to get a higher grade :)

Thanks for the tip Simon. I added a couple lines describing the steps I took. It wasn't much.
 
Well OK - did that help you gain confidence with your work?

How would you explain to a less experienced student why you chose that particular approach to solving the problem - or did you just guess and hope it turned out right?

I know this sounds like an obtuse way to tell you you've done OK but you are at the next step where you need to be able to work out for yourself if you did right or not: the point of learning physics is to be able to solve problems that nobody knows the answer to so there is nobody to ask. The earlier you start learning how to tell if you've got it right the better you'll be at it - and the skill is general, you'll use it whatever you end up doing.
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top