Calculating the Schmid factor for an FCC single crystal

  • Thread starter Thread starter jbrown110
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Crystal Fcc
jbrown110
Messages
2
Reaction score
0
The problem said:
"Determine the magnitude of the Schmid factor for an FCC single crystal oriented with its [100] direction parallel to the loading axis. "

The Schmid factor is the

"cos(\phi)*cos(\lambda)"

term in the equation for resolved shear stress.

I know that the slip planes for an FCC single crystal are the four {111} planes, and the slip directions are the three <110> directions inside each of the {111} planes.

To solve for \phi, the angle between the <111> direction and the loading direction, <100>, I said that it was equal to

Cos^{-1}((1*1+1*0+1*0)/\sqrt{(1^2+1^2+1^2)*(1^2)})

That comes out to 1/\sqrt{3}

And using the same equation, I found that \lambda, the angle between the loading direction, <100>, and the slip direction, <01-1>, is \pi/2

Multiplying \phi and \lambda should have given me the schmid factor, according to my textbook, but I couldn't get the right answer.

The answer is .408, but I kept getting something different and I'm not sure why. If some one could explain this to me, I would be very grateful. Thanks
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Hi jbrown110, welcome to PF. Your slip direction doesn't lie within your slip plane. You're going to have a hard time obtaining slip that way. :smile:
 
So, basically I picked the one direction that doesn't work for the [111] plane. haha

I reworked it with the other two possible slip directions and they both gave the right answer.

Thanks for the reply.
 
You're welcome!
 
From the BCS theory of superconductivity is well known that the superfluid density smoothly decreases with increasing temperature. Annihilated superfluid carriers become normal and lose their momenta on lattice atoms. So if we induce a persistent supercurrent in a ring below Tc and after that slowly increase the temperature, we must observe a decrease in the actual supercurrent, because the density of electron pairs and total supercurrent momentum decrease. However, this supercurrent...
Hi. I have got question as in title. How can idea of instantaneous dipole moment for atoms like, for example hydrogen be consistent with idea of orbitals? At my level of knowledge London dispersion forces are derived taking into account Bohr model of atom. But we know today that this model is not correct. If it would be correct I understand that at each time electron is at some point at radius at some angle and there is dipole moment at this time from nucleus to electron at orbit. But how...
Back
Top