Calculating the Sum of Odd Digits in Powers of 2: A Fascinating Number Property

  • Thread starter Thread starter Zhivago
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Sum
AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on the series sum of odd digits in powers of 2, represented as ∑_{n=1}^{∞} o(2^n)/2^n = 1/9, where o(2^n) counts the odd digits of 2^n. Participants express excitement about the mathematical properties of this series, referencing sources like MathWorld and a JSTOR paper for further insights. The book "Experimentation in Mathematics" is also mentioned as providing an accessible proof of the summation. The conversation highlights the intriguing nature of these number properties and the ease of understanding them through geometric series and modular arithmetic. Overall, the series and its implications spark interest among those exploring mathematical curiosities.
Zhivago
Messages
25
Reaction score
1
\sum_{n=1}^{\infty} \frac{o(2^n)}{2^n} = \frac{1}{9}
where o(2^n) is the number of odd digits of 2^n.

Found it in
http://mathworld.wolfram.com/DigitCount.html
equation (9)
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
That's a pretty amazing series. I found some more information about it in the following paper. See : http://www.jstor.org/view/00029890/di991774/99p0626c/0
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Curses, JSTOR!
 
uart said:
That's a pretty amazing series. I found some more information about it in the following paper. See : http://www.jstor.org/view/00029890/di991774/99p0626c/0

Fantastic! Thanks a lot!
Also found it in
Experimentation in Mathematics: Computational Paths to Discovery
By Jonathan M. Borwein, David H. Bailey, Roland
pag 14-15

here's a google link:
http://books.google.com/books?id=cs...over&sig=yE9mO3b-YA9lLjAq6Nt4ED4bn1g#PPA15,M1

I'm no mathematician, but found really interesting some of these strange number properties.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Zhivago said:
...here's a google link:
http://books.google.com/books?id=cs...over&sig=yE9mO3b-YA9lLjAq6Nt4ED4bn1g#PPA15,M1

I'm no mathematician, but found really interesting some of these strange number properties.

Thanks for the link Zhivago. Yes that book provides a nice accessible proof of that summation. In the link I posted they only really hinted at how that series was handled but in your link they nail it (only really needing knowledge of geomeric series and modolu athrithmetic to follow it). Good stuff!
 
Last edited:
Fermat's Last Theorem has long been one of the most famous mathematical problems, and is now one of the most famous theorems. It simply states that the equation $$ a^n+b^n=c^n $$ has no solutions with positive integers if ##n>2.## It was named after Pierre de Fermat (1607-1665). The problem itself stems from the book Arithmetica by Diophantus of Alexandria. It gained popularity because Fermat noted in his copy "Cubum autem in duos cubos, aut quadratoquadratum in duos quadratoquadratos, et...
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...
Thread 'Imaginary Pythagorus'
I posted this in the Lame Math thread, but it's got me thinking. Is there any validity to this? Or is it really just a mathematical trick? Naively, I see that i2 + plus 12 does equal zero2. But does this have a meaning? I know one can treat the imaginary number line as just another axis like the reals, but does that mean this does represent a triangle in the complex plane with a hypotenuse of length zero? Ibix offered a rendering of the diagram using what I assume is matrix* notation...

Similar threads

Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
0
Views
2K
Replies
6
Views
2K
Replies
5
Views
2K
Replies
4
Views
2K
Back
Top