Calculating the Time-Average Intensity of 3 Slits

  • Thread starter Thread starter maxim07
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Intensity
AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on calculating the time-average intensity of light from three slits, emphasizing the relationship between electric field amplitude and intensity. Participants clarify that intensity is proportional to the square of the amplitude, leading to the conclusion that the maximum value of the amplitude expression is 9, requiring division of the total intensity, I0, by this factor. There is confusion regarding the averaging of the sine function, with the understanding that averaging sin² over cycles yields a factor of 1/2. The final expression for the time-average intensity is derived, highlighting the importance of not averaging over the position y. The conversation underscores the need for clarity in defining symbols and equations to facilitate understanding.
maxim07
Messages
53
Reaction score
8
Homework Statement
If the three slits have equal widths, show that intensity I1 of light on the screen as a function of y is I = I/9[1 + 2cos(2pi * dy/Rw)]^2 where w is wavelength

If the width of the central slit is made twice as wide show that the intensity becomes I = 16I/9cos^4(pi*dy/Rw)
Relevant Equations
Sin/cosine addition formulas
Here’s an image of the equations better layed out
0CB6F41A-326A-4A4E-A8F0-2C4A92A9AEF0.jpeg

4D80FE8E-18D4-46CD-BA94-B9B4B6A31560.jpeg

here’s the solution, I don’t understand how they are squaring it to get the time average

DED9F404-0900-4CD7-9E31-8864CC746694.jpeg
 
Physics news on Phys.org
maxim07 said:
I don’t understand how they are squaring it to get the time average
Your problem description is incomplete, e.g. no diagram or definition of all symbols. (Though the missing information may not be necessary to answer your question.)

And you haven’t actually explained your difficulty.

Do you understand up to the part where the total (electric) field amplitude as a function of ##y## is given by ##Asin(1+2cos\phi)## where ##\phi = \frac {2\pi dy}{R\lambda}##?

Remember, intensity is proportional to the square of the amplitude of the electric field. What is the maximum possible value of ##(1+ 2cos\phi)^2##?
 
I understand up to Asin(1+2cosφ). The max value of (1+2cosφ)^2 = 9 so you have to divide I0 by 9. I understand that now, but if the (1+2cosΦ) is the amplitude then the sinx must get averaged, but I thought that would introduce a factor of 1/2?
 
The constant ##I_0## is defined to be the total intensity for ##y = 0## for the three equal-sized slits. So, the resultant expression for ##I(y)## for this case must reduce to ##I_0## for ##y = 0##.

##I_0## already includes the contribution due to time averaging as well as any constants of proportionality between intensity and square of the amplitude.
 
  • Like
Likes Steve4Physics
maxim07 said:
.. if the (1+2cosΦ) is the amplitude then the sinx must get averaged, but I thought that would introduce a factor of 1/2?
Can I add this to what @TSny has said:

Remember ##\phi = \frac {2\pi dy}{R\lambda}##.

The field at position y, time t can be expressed in full as, say:
##E(y,t) = Asin(1+2cos(\frac {2\pi dy}{R\lambda}))sin(ωt + α)##
so
##E(y,t)^2 = A^2sin^2(1+2cos( \frac {2\pi dy}{R\lambda}))sin^2(ωt + φ)##

The average of ##sin^2(\text {anything})## over a complete number of cycles is ½. So the time- average of the field at y is:
##<E(y,t)^2>_{time} = ½A^2sin^2(1+2cos( \frac {2\pi dy}{R\lambda}))##

(We definitely don’t want to average over y as we are interested in the intensity for each value of y!)
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top