Calculating Time for Turntable Platter to Stop at 0rpm

  • Thread starter Thread starter utility_belt
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Physics Turntable
AI Thread Summary
To model the stopping time of a turntable platter after power is cut, the coefficient of friction between the platter and the turntable is essential. Without friction, the platter would not stop, making it a critical factor for calculations. Users can measure the friction force using a scale or time how long it takes to stop to derive the coefficient. In this case, the average stopping time was measured at 15 seconds, and the initial velocity was converted to radians per second. The formula to find the coefficient of friction involves using gravitational acceleration (g), which is approximately 9.81 m/s².
utility_belt
Messages
3
Reaction score
0
Hi all,

I haven't studied rotational physics in a long time so this may be a stupid question, but here goes. I'm trying to model the properties of a turntable (record player). Using the theories of rotational motion, is it possible to calculate the time it would take for the spinning turntable platter to come to a complete stop when the power to the motor is cut?

Given that I know the starting velocity is 33 rpm, the final velocity is 0rpm and the weight of the platter is 1.996kg is it possible to calculate the time it takes to come to a complete stop?

Thanks for you help!
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
Yes, but you would need to know the coefficient of friction between the turntable and the platter. If there were no friction, the platter would never stop. Once you have the magnitude of the friction force you can find the angular deceleration of the platter and how long it would take for its angular velocity to become 0.
 
Ah yes, I thought that would be the missing factor. I assume this (the friction between the turntable and the platter) is something that is not so easy to measure/calculate?
 
If you can find such a turntable, it is very easy to calculate. Just measure how much force it takes to turn it. All you need is a small scale.

The other thing you could do is to time how long it takes to come to a stop. With a little algebraic manipulation you can solve the equation for the coefficient of friction.

Or you could guess. Maybe around .1 ? Does it have bearings?
-Mike
 
Last edited by a moderator:
V(t) = V_0 + at
In our case the platter stops so V(t) is zero:
t = -\frac{V_0}{a}
(a will also be negative so the time will be positive.)

Finding a is just a matter of: (fk being kinetic friction)
\Sigma F = ma = -f_k = -N\mu = -mg\mu
a = -g\mu

Plug that into the formula above:
t = \frac{V_0}{g\mu}
And you're done. :smile:
Or if you have the time and want to find the coefficient of friction:
\mu = \frac{V_0}{gt}
 
OK,

Thanks Chen. I've measured the time it takes for the turntable to stop, and get an average of about 15 seconds. I'm trying to put that into your last formula, to find the coefficient of friction but am unsure of a couple of variables.

V(0) Velocity is 33.33 rpm so = 3.49 rad/s
t Time is = 15s

So that would make: Coefficient = 3.49 / (g * 15)

Stupid question, what is g?
Thanks.
 
Thread 'Question about pressure of a liquid'
I am looking at pressure in liquids and I am testing my idea. The vertical tube is 100m, the contraption is filled with water. The vertical tube is very thin(maybe 1mm^2 cross section). The area of the base is ~100m^2. Will he top half be launched in the air if suddenly it cracked?- assuming its light enough. I want to test my idea that if I had a thin long ruber tube that I lifted up, then the pressure at "red lines" will be high and that the $force = pressure * area$ would be massive...
I feel it should be solvable we just need to find a perfect pattern, and there will be a general pattern since the forces acting are based on a single function, so..... you can't actually say it is unsolvable right? Cause imaging 3 bodies actually existed somwhere in this universe then nature isn't gonna wait till we predict it! And yea I have checked in many places that tiny changes cause large changes so it becomes chaos........ but still I just can't accept that it is impossible to solve...
Back
Top