Calculating Trajectory of a Plane Flying at 100m/s

Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around calculating the trajectory of a plane flying at a speed of 100 m/s from a height of 18 m above water. The problem involves determining the trajectory from release to the first impact point and analyzing the effects of bounces on vertical and horizontal velocities.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Conceptual clarification, Mathematical reasoning, Problem interpretation

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants discuss methods to calculate the vertical velocity at impact using potential and kinetic energy, and how to determine the height of subsequent bounces. There are inquiries about rearranging equations and the role of mass in potential and kinetic energy calculations.

Discussion Status

Participants are exploring various approaches to the problem, including energy conservation principles and the use of coefficients of restitution. Some guidance has been offered regarding the relationship between potential and kinetic energy, but there is no explicit consensus on the best method to proceed.

Contextual Notes

There are constraints related to the lack of mass information and the need to calculate trajectories and velocities after multiple bounces. Participants are also considering the use of spreadsheets for calculations.

qubert
Messages
8
Reaction score
0
Question is:
plane flies at a speed of 100m/s at a height of 18m above water
plot the trajectory from release to first impact point, in intervals of 0.2m

managed this and have plotted the trajectory, with relevant velocities and resultant but the next part asks:

"At each bounce the vertical and horizontal velocity is reduced by a factor of 0.696, if the resultant speed has to be between 5 and 6m/s determine the number of bounces and horizontal distance the bomb requires without bouncing over."

how would one rearrange the equations finding the first trajectory without knowing the height the second bounce starts from?

i thought maybe by using a quadratic and pythagoras:

(100x0.696B)^2+(18.78x0.696B)^2=5.5^2 where b is the number of bounces, 100 and 18.78 are the horizontal and vertical velocities on the first drop

is this anywhere near correct?

thanks
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
Firstly just consider the vertical direction.
Assume all the potential energy turns into kinetic at the ground.
Calculate the potential energy at the start and the kinetic energy at impact to get the vertical velocity at impact
Then use the new velocity to get the kinetic energy that it starts back up with.
Use this to get the potential energy and so the height of the next bounce.

Once you have the height and so the time for each bounce you can also get the horizontal velocity for each bounce in the same way.

I would probably do this a line at a time eg on a spreadsheet rather than trying to write an analytical eqaution for the end result.
 
is it possible to work out the potential energy without the mass of the object? would there be another way to work out the height of the next bounce?
 
The mass is in the potential energy and the kinetic energy so it cancels out.
If the only change is in the velocity then you can only work it out with kinetic energy, of course you can write the an equation for the height of the next bounce but that is just using ke/pe anyway
 
so pe=176.4j before being dropped and ke=176.4j at impact, how would it be rearranged to find out the new velocity? (ive never used these formulae before so sorry if I am slow) is the co efficient of restitution used here at all? thanks
 
Last edited:
ke = 1/2 mv^2 so V = sqrt( 2 ke / m )
Then the V immediately after the bounce is 0.696V or you can use the equation to calculate what the change in KE would be directly without workign out the speed.
 
sorry I am still not following, would i be able to send you the excel spreadsheet i have so far so you can take a look at what I've done? thanks
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 38 ·
2
Replies
38
Views
4K
  • · Replies 16 ·
Replies
16
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 81 ·
3
Replies
81
Views
8K
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 18 ·
Replies
18
Views
3K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
5K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
2K