Calculating Velocity of Water Flow in Open Channel

Click For Summary
The discussion focuses on calculating the velocity of water flow in an open channel using Bernoulli's equation. The key point is determining under what conditions the pressure at point 1 can be assumed to be hydrostatic, specifically whether it is independent of fluid flow. It is noted that pressure variation is hydrostatic in the vertical direction when the flow is horizontal, but concerns arise regarding pressure changes if there is a vertical flow component. The conversation also touches on the continuity of pressure across a phase boundary in inviscid fluids and the effects of crossflow on Pitot tube measurements. Understanding these principles is crucial for accurately measuring fluid velocity in open channels.
Kqwert
Messages
160
Reaction score
3

Homework Statement


[/B]
We have water flowing in an open channel. A small tube is placed in the channel, and the water raises to a height "l" above the water surface. The distance from the water surface to point 1/2 (points are at same height) is d. At point 1 the fluid velocity is V1 and at point 2 it is zero (stagnation point). Calculate the water velocity V1. (Figure below for help)

nOugtE0.png

Homework Equations


Bernoulli:
(1/2)*V^2 + P/rho + g*z = constant.

The Attempt at a Solution



First I calculate the stagnation pressure Ps, by using Bernoulli from 1 to 2. This yields:

(1/2)*V1^2 + P1/rho = 0 + P2/rho

Ps = rho*(1/2)*V1^2 + P1

Then I calculate the pressure through the tube, where we have hydrostatic conditions. P0 is the atmospheric pressure.:

Ps = P0 + rho*g*l + rho*g*d.

My question is:

under which conditions can we assume that P1 = rho*g*d, i.e. under which conditions can we assume that the pressure at point 1 is independent of the fluid flow at that point? Is it only when the fluid flow is ONLY horizontal?
 

Attachments

  • nOugtE0.png
    nOugtE0.png
    3.8 KB · Views: 392
Physics news on Phys.org
Kqwert said:
under which conditions can we assume that P1 = rho*g*d, i.e. under which conditions can we assume that the pressure at point 1 is independent of the fluid flow at that point? Is it only when the fluid flow is ONLY horizontal?
It's an open channel. Think of standing by a river moving at any speed. What would you expect the pressure to be at a depth d?
 
rude man said:
It's an open channel. Think of standing by a river moving at any speed. What would you expect the pressure to be at a depth d?
If it´s moving I would assume that it would be dependent on the depth d but also the speed the river is moving
 
Kqwert said:
If it´s moving I would assume that it would be dependent on the depth d but also the speed the river is moving
Since the flow is horizontal, as we said in the other thread, the pressure variation is hydrostatic in the vertical direction (at least in a region undisturbed by the pitot tube).
 
Kqwert said:
If it´s moving I would assume that it would be dependent on the depth d but also the speed the river is moving
Can you have a sudden change in pressure as you go from just above its surface to just below? So what must presure be just below? And so the pressure at a depth d?
 
Measurement of fluid velocity with a Pitot tube is based on Bernoulli's equation which represents the conservation of energy per unit volume of fluid flow. p(total), pt, represents the total energy; p(static), ps, represents the potential energy: and q = ρU^2 / 2 = dynamic pressure, represents the kinetic energy. So pt - ps = q, solving for U =√2(pt - ps)/ρ. With your probe you are measuring pt so you need to calculate ps based on the hydrostatic pressure at depth d. And do not forget to account for the atmospheric on top of the open channel and the open top of your probe.
 
Chestermiller said:
Since the flow is horizontal, as we said in the other thread, the pressure variation is hydrostatic in the vertical direction (at least in a region undisturbed by the pitot tube).
Thank you, but what would happen if we also had a flow component in the z-direction?
 
rude man said:
Can you have a sudden change in pressure as you go from just above its surface to just below? So what must presure be just below? And so the pressure at a depth d?
I am not exactly sure what you are trying to say?
 
Kqwert said:
Thank you, but what would happen if we also had a flow component in the z-direction?
It depends on (a) if the fluid velocity is accelerating in the z direction and (b) if the fluid were being regarded as inviscid or viscous.
 
  • #10
Kqwert said:
I am not exactly sure what you are trying to say?
I am trying to show that the pressure just below the surface is the same as above, i.e. atmospheric, regardless of the flow velocity.
OK, we have a river, not flowing. A block of wood floats on it, half-in, half-out. Now the river starts to flow. Is the block still submerged 50-50?
 
  • #11
rude man said:
I am trying to show that the pressure just below the surface is the same as above, i.e. atmospheric, regardless of the flow velocity.
OK, we have a river, not flowing. A block of wood floats on it, half-in, half-out. Now the river starts to flow. Is the block still submerged 50-50?
Irrespective of the flow, if surface tension effects are negligible and the fluid is inviscid, pressure is continuous across a phase boundary. For a viscous fluid, the traction vector(which includes the pressure) is continuous.

If you carry out a force balance on a differential element of surface area within the interface (which has no mass), the forces exerted by the fluids situated on the two sides of the interface must match (since ma = 0).
 
Last edited:
  • #12
This is not that complicated. The total pressure in the Pitot tube is q + p(static) and p(static) = ρgh + p(atmospheric). The conversion factor is 406 inches water = 1 atmosphere = 101.3 kPa. U(m/s) = √2q(n/m^2) / ρ(kg/m^3) The sensitivity of the Pitot tube to crossflow is of course dependent on the relative magnitude of the crossflow. I found in an experiment measuring the airspeed of an automobile, that a crosswind of 10 mph gusting to 15 mph had an effect on the measurement of the ground speed at 20, 30. and 40 mph of less than 10%.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
1K
Replies
19
Views
1K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
4K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
3K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
3K
  • · Replies 16 ·
Replies
16
Views
2K
  • · Replies 17 ·
Replies
17
Views
2K
  • · Replies 30 ·
2
Replies
30
Views
3K
Replies
12
Views
1K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
1K