Calculating Vertical Motion: Am I on the Right Track?

Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around a problem in kinematics involving vertical motion. The original poster is tasked with calculating the time to reach the ground, the velocity at a specific height, and the time to reach a different height after projecting a body vertically upwards with an initial velocity.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Assumption checking, Problem interpretation

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • The original poster attempts to apply kinematic equations to find time and velocity but faces questions regarding the use of time from previous calculations and the relevance of distance in determining velocity.
  • Some participants question the appropriateness of the calculations and the assumptions made about the motion, particularly regarding the use of time and units.
  • Others suggest reconsidering the equations used and emphasize the importance of using consistent units in calculations.

Discussion Status

The discussion is active, with participants providing guidance on the correct application of kinematic equations and questioning the original poster's approach. There is a focus on clarifying misunderstandings and ensuring the correct interpretation of the problem.

Contextual Notes

Participants note the importance of using SI units consistently and highlight potential errors in calculations, such as the use of incorrect distances and time values derived from previous parts of the problem.

anthonyk2013
Messages
125
Reaction score
0
Wondering if I am on the right track with below question

A body is projected vertically upwards from ground level with an initial velocity of 400m/s. determine;
(a) Time to reach the ground
(b) Velocity at a point 1.8km above the ground
(c) Time to reach a vertical height of 2.5km.


(a)
u=440m/s
v=0m/s
a=-9.81m/s

v=u+at
0=400+(-9.81)t
-400/-9.81=t
t=40.77sec

total time to reach ground 40.77*2=81.54sec

(b)

s=ut+1/2at2

s=400*40.77+1/2*(-9.81)*40.772

s=1908 + (-8153.05)

s=-6245.05 m = 6.24km
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Where's c? And why did you find the distance for b when it asked for the velocity?
 
adjacent said:
Where's c? And why did you find the distance for b when it asked for the velocity?

only half way through (b) haven't started (c)

though I need the distance to calculate the velocity at 1.8km? maybe I m wrong?
 
anthonyk2013 said:
(b)

s=ut+1/2at2

s=400*40.77+1/2*(-9.81)*40.772
Why are you using half the time from part (a)? That will give you the maximum height, no? The question does not ask for that.
You are given initial speed, acceleration, distance, and you are asked for final speed. What SUVAT equation connects those four?
(Btw, you dropped a factor of 10 in the first term of the calculation, giving you a negative maximum height. You should have realized that meant you'd made a mistake, but instead you just changed the sign.)
 
haruspex said:
Why are you using half the time from part (a)? That will give you the maximum height, no? The question does not ask for that.
You are given initial speed, acceleration, distance, and you are asked for final speed. What SUVAT equation connects those four?
(Btw, you dropped a factor of 10 in the first term of the calculation, giving you a negative maximum height. You should have realized that meant you'd made a mistake, but instead you just changed the sign.)

I should use V2=U2+2as

V2=4002+2*(-9.81)*1.8

V2=square root of 159964.684

V=399.95m/s
(c)
Having trouble transposing formula to find time for part (C) not sure if the below is correct?
S=2.5kn or 2500m
u=400m/s
v=0m/s

S=(u+v)/2*t

t=s/(u+v)/2

t=2500/(400+0)/2

t=12.5sec
 
Last edited:
anthonyk2013 said:
I should use V2=U2+2as

V2=4002+2*(-9.81)*1.8

V2=square root of 159964.684

V=399.95m/s
1.8 was given in kilo meters.You should use SI units in the Kinematics equations.
You have used m/s for speed m/s^2 for acceleration and a wrong distance.Convert it to meters first.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 31 ·
2
Replies
31
Views
4K
Replies
6
Views
2K
Replies
19
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 20 ·
Replies
20
Views
2K
  • · Replies 38 ·
2
Replies
38
Views
4K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
40
Views
3K
Replies
13
Views
2K