Calculating Vertical Motion: Am I on the Right Track?

Join the discussion
Ask a follow-up here, or get your own question answered by working scientists, mathematicians and engineers — people, not an autocomplete.
Real named experts · corrections over time · the nuance an AI answer skips
5 replies · 2K views
anthonyk2013
Messages
125
Reaction score
0
Wondering if I am on the right track with below question

A body is projected vertically upwards from ground level with an initial velocity of 400m/s. determine;
(a) Time to reach the ground
(b) Velocity at a point 1.8km above the ground
(c) Time to reach a vertical height of 2.5km.


(a)
u=440m/s
v=0m/s
a=-9.81m/s

v=u+at
0=400+(-9.81)t
-400/-9.81=t
t=40.77sec

total time to reach ground 40.77*2=81.54sec

(b)

s=ut+1/2at2

s=400*40.77+1/2*(-9.81)*40.772

s=1908 + (-8153.05)

s=-6245.05 m = 6.24km
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Where's c? And why did you find the distance for b when it asked for the velocity?
 
adjacent said:
Where's c? And why did you find the distance for b when it asked for the velocity?

only half way through (b) haven't started (c)

though I need the distance to calculate the velocity at 1.8km? maybe I m wrong?
 
anthonyk2013 said:
(b)

s=ut+1/2at2

s=400*40.77+1/2*(-9.81)*40.772
Why are you using half the time from part (a)? That will give you the maximum height, no? The question does not ask for that.
You are given initial speed, acceleration, distance, and you are asked for final speed. What SUVAT equation connects those four?
(Btw, you dropped a factor of 10 in the first term of the calculation, giving you a negative maximum height. You should have realized that meant you'd made a mistake, but instead you just changed the sign.)
 
haruspex said:
Why are you using half the time from part (a)? That will give you the maximum height, no? The question does not ask for that.
You are given initial speed, acceleration, distance, and you are asked for final speed. What SUVAT equation connects those four?
(Btw, you dropped a factor of 10 in the first term of the calculation, giving you a negative maximum height. You should have realized that meant you'd made a mistake, but instead you just changed the sign.)

I should use V2=U2+2as

V2=4002+2*(-9.81)*1.8

V2=square root of 159964.684

V=399.95m/s
(c)
Having trouble transposing formula to find time for part (C) not sure if the below is correct?
S=2.5kn or 2500m
u=400m/s
v=0m/s

S=(u+v)/2*t

t=s/(u+v)/2

t=2500/(400+0)/2

t=12.5sec
 
Last edited:
anthonyk2013 said:
I should use V2=U2+2as

V2=4002+2*(-9.81)*1.8

V2=square root of 159964.684

V=399.95m/s
1.8 was given in kilo meters.You should use SI units in the Kinematics equations.
You have used m/s for speed m/s^2 for acceleration and a wrong distance.Convert it to meters first.