Calculating Voltage in a Circuit with Capacitors and Resistors

  • Thread starter Thread starter jsmith613
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Circuit Voltage
Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around calculating voltage in a circuit involving capacitors and resistors, specifically focusing on the values in a table related to time increments and the relationship between charge, voltage, and current.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Assumption checking, Conceptual clarification

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants explore the use of the equation Q=CV and question why an alternative method involving voltage across capacitors and resistors does not yield the expected results for specific cells in a table.

Discussion Status

Participants are actively questioning the relationship between current and voltage at different time steps, with some suggesting that the current values are misaligned with the potential differences. There is a recognition that understanding the time-step model is crucial for interpreting the data correctly.

Contextual Notes

There is mention of potential confusion due to the timing of current measurements and the corresponding voltage values, as well as a reference to specific homework constraints that may limit the methods allowed for solving the problem.

jsmith613
Messages
609
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


PD_Capacitor.png
Link: http://s359.photobucket.com/albums/oo40/jsmith613/?action=view&current=PD_Capacitor.png
How is cell E3 calculated?

Homework Equations

The Attempt at a Solution



now I know I can use Q=CV BUT another possible method is to say:
Voltage-Capacitor + Voltage-resistor = 5V (voltage supply)

V-capacitor: 5-(1.11*3) = 1.67 (the m and k powers of +3 and -3 cancel)
But this gives the value in cell E2...why does this method not work for E3?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Column E seems suspiciously in step with column D. :smile:
V-capacitor: 5-(1.11*3) = 1.67 (the m and k powers of +3 and -3 cancel)
But this gives the value in cell E2...why does this method not work for E3?
The current changes during each 0.1 sec increment. The current listed is that at the start of each time period; the current at the end of each time period is listed as for the start of the next time period.
 
Last edited:
NascentOxygen said:
Column E seems suspiciously in step with column D. :smile:

thats because of Q=CV
but what I want to know is why my method does not work :S
thanks
 
jsmith613 said:
now I know I can use Q=CV BUT another possible method is to say:
Voltage-Capacitor + Voltage-resistor = 5V (voltage supply)

V-capacitor: 5-(1.11*3) = 1.67 (the m and k powers of +3 and -3 cancel)
But this gives the value in cell E2...why does this method not work for E3?

You should pay attention to the units associated with the values and not just the numerical values. You may be comparing apples and oranges.

Think about what the "Δ" in ΔQ stands for.
 
gneill said:
You should pay attention to the units associated with the values and not just the numerical values. You may be comparing apples and oranges.

Think about what the "Δ" in ΔQ stands for.

well it means "change in charge"...
 
NascentOxygen said:
The current changes during each 0.1 sec increment. The current listed is that at the start of each time period; the current at the end of each time period is listed as for the start of the next time period.

why would I use the end current (i.e the one in the next row down) to find the voltage across the resistor...surely the p.d given is that at the start too??
 
gneill said:
You should pay attention to the units associated with the values and not just the numerical values. You may be comparing apples and oranges.

Think about what the "Δ" in ΔQ stands for.

well it means "change in charge"...
the bigger question is though, why must I use the current in the row below to find the voltage across the resistor...?
 
The currents given pertain to the initial current at the beginning of each time step, which is to say, they also correspond to the current at then END of the previous time step. So you would expect I*R to give the voltage drop at the END of the last time step (and the beginning of the current time step). On the other hand, the total charges and the potentials on a given line correspond to the end of the current time step. So the currents are one time step out of sync with the potential differences displayed on a given line.
 
gneill said:
So the currents are one time step out of sync with the potential differences displayed on a given line.

ok...how was this obvious from the data given...perhaps I am missing something big but this bit is clearly what is confusing me
 
  • #10
It's not so much obvious as having to figure out how the table was built using a time step model. What values pertain to which instants in time?
 
  • #11
gneill said:
It's not so much obvious as having to figure out how the table was built using a time step model. What values pertain to which instants in time?

I have never studies time-step models...I presume I will just stick to the Q=CV method (which is what was on the MS...my other method appears not to work very well with this table, based on what I know)
 
  • #12
I agree with all that gneill has written and will add that for charging a capacitor at t=0
I is max = E/r, Vc = 0 and Qc = 0.
At t= 0 you have measured I = 1.67mA which means the voltage across r = 1.67mA x 3000 ohms = 5V... confirming that this is a capacitor at the start of charging.
Row 2 for t = 0 should have Q = 0 and V = 0
 
  • #13
truesearch said:
I agree with all that gneill has written and will add that for charging a capacitor at t=0
I is max = E/r, Vc = 0 and Qc = 0.
At t= 0 you have measured I = 1.67mA which means the voltage across r = 1.67mA x 3000 ohms = 5V... confirming that this is a capacitor at the start of charging.
Row 2 for t = 0 should have Q = 0 and V = 0

ok so the examiners were clearly looking for use of Q=CV ONLY as this is the ONLY method that apparently works...never mind...I guess you have to give 'em what they want :)
 

Similar threads

Replies
2
Views
1K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
3K
  • · Replies 62 ·
3
Replies
62
Views
6K
Replies
3
Views
1K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
Replies
20
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
2K
Replies
16
Views
4K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
3K