Calculating Warp Speeds and Travel Times Using Alcubierre Warp Drive

  • Thread starter Thread starter dividebyxero
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Starship
AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on calculating warp speeds and travel times using an Alcubierre warp drive for a fictional spaceship. The ship is assumed to take four weeks to cross 100,000 light years, accelerating for the first half and decelerating for the second half of the journey. Participants discuss the inadequacy of Newtonian equations for such speeds and suggest using relativistic equations, while noting that time dilation may not apply to Alcubierre drives. The calculations provided indicate a final velocity of approximately 2,608,928 times the speed of light and an acceleration rate of 646,608,059 meters per second squared. The conversation concludes with a confirmation of the method for calculating travel durations for other trips using the provided equations.
dividebyxero
Messages
5
Reaction score
0
I'm trying to figure how fast this ship can reach various destinations in a story I'm working on and I have no background in advance math of any kind (If teachers had offered more interesting scenario questions like this one I might have paid more attention in class, instead they gave me those idiotic "train leaving LA and another leaving NY" sort of questions).


Assume the following:

* The ship uses an Alcubierre warp drive

* It takes 4 weeks to cross the galaxy (100,000 light years in 28 days exactly just for simplicity's sake)

* The ship will accelerate for the first half of its journey, reverse engines, and decelerate for the last half.

My questions are:

- What is its rate of acceleration?

- How fast is it moving at the halfway point of the sample trip above?

- How does one calculate the answer to this sort of question so I could determine the travel time of other trips (from Sol to Polaris for example)?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
The kinematics equations will give you what you need.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Equations_of_motion#Classic_version

9335a678ca322db23430ee705f9d3345.png


You know u, t and s.

Plug those in and you get the final velocity and the acceleration.

Remember, t and s are half the total values as you are only looking at half the journey. You want t in seconds and s in metres.

Use number 2 to get your final velocity v, and then 1 to get acceleration.
 
dividebyxero said:
Assume the following:

* The ship uses an Alcubierre warp drive

* It takes 4 weeks to cross the galaxy (100,000 light years in 28 days exactly just for simplicity's sake)

* The ship will accelerate for the first half of its journey, reverse engines, and decelerate for the last half.
Newtonian equation are completely inadequate for the speeds you are proposing. For relativistic speeds you should use the equations given here http://www.phys.ncku.edu.tw/mirrors/physicsfaq/Relativity/SR/rocket.html

On the face of it using Earth time your ship is traveling at 12,700,000 times the speed of light and even the relativistic equations I gave are inadequate. SR can not handle speeds that are greater than the speed of light. However, if you mean 28 days as measured by the passengers on board the ship (proper time) then your figures *might be* compatible with SR when taking time dilation into account. The acceleration would probably have to be much greater than 1g as used in the link I gave, but this *might* not be a problem for the Alcubierre drive, because the passengers apparently do not feel the acceleration with that form of drive (if it can exist in principle).
 
Last edited by a moderator:
yuiop said:
Newtonian equation are completely inadequate for the speeds you are proposing. For relativistic speeds you should use the equations given here http://www.phys.ncku.edu.tw/mirrors/physicsfaq/Relativity/SR/rocket.html

On the face of it using Earth time your ship is traveling at 12,700,000 times the speed of light and even the relativistic equations I gave are inadequate. SR can not handle speeds that are greater than the speed of light. However, if you mean 28 days as measured by the passengers on board the ship (proper time) then your figures *may be* compatible with SR when taking time dilation into account. The acceleration would probably have to be much greater than 1g as used in the link I gave, but this might not a problem for the Alcubierre drive because the passengers apparently do not feel the acceleration with that form of drive (if it can exist in principle).

Alcubbiere drives don't experience time dilation because of the way they are proposed to work.

The equations I gave were simply to give a basic set of values - it's sci-fi, keep it simple and don't try to explain it - especially as the OP has little understanding of the maths required.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
jarednjames said:
Alcubbiere drives don't experience time dilation because of the way they are proposed to work.

The equations I gave were simply to give a basic set of values - it's sci-fi, keep it simple and don't try to explain it - especially as the OP has little understanding of the maths required.


Correct. That's why I mentioned the method of propulsion, I figured that would indicate that time dilation is not meant to be a factor.

In any event, thanks for the replies! :)
 
Ok, just want to double check my figures.

* s = The halfway point of the trip (where acceleration will stop) is 50,000 ly or 473036523629040000000 meters

* t = Time to reach that distance is 14 days or 1,209,600 seconds

From those we get:

* v = Final velocity is 782137109175000 meters per second (2,608,928 times the speed of light)

Meaning that the rate of acceleration (a) should be 646608059 meters (or 2.15 light years) per second (per second?)


Furthermore, if I'm reading the suvat equations correctly I should be able to calculate the duration of any other trip by doing line 5 as it is, getting the square root of that result which should end up as v, then using that in: (v - u) / a = t

Is that correct?
 
I think it's easist first to watch a short vidio clip I find these videos very relaxing to watch .. I got to thinking is this being done in the most efficient way? The sand has to be suspended in the water to move it to the outlet ... The faster the water , the more turbulance and the sand stays suspended, so it seems to me the rule of thumb is the hose be aimed towards the outlet at all times .. Many times the workers hit the sand directly which will greatly reduce the water...
Back
Top