Calculating Work and Forces on a Sliding Piano

  • Thread starter Thread starter VanKwisH
  • Start date Start date
Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The problem involves calculating forces and work related to a 300 kg piano sliding down a 25-degree incline, with a man pushing against it to prevent acceleration. The effective coefficient of friction is given as 0.4.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Assumption checking, Problem interpretation

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants discuss the components of gravitational force acting down the ramp and the frictional force acting up the ramp. There are questions about the calculations for these forces and how they relate to the force the man must exert.

Discussion Status

Some participants are working through the calculations and questioning the results they are obtaining. There is an acknowledgment of potential errors in calculations, such as using the wrong mode on a calculator. Guidance has been offered on how to approach the problem by considering the forces acting on the piano.

Contextual Notes

Participants note the importance of showing work and using correct units in calculations to avoid errors. There is a mention of the need for clarity in distinguishing between different force components.

VanKwisH
Messages
107
Reaction score
0
Power,Work,Energy problem...

Homework Statement


A 300 kg piano slides 4.5 m down a 25degree incline and is kept from accelerating
by a man who is pushing back on it parallel to the incline the effective co-efficient of friction
is 0.4 Calculate
A) the force exerted by the man (answer is 180N)
B) the work done by the man on the piano (Answer is -800 J)
C) the work done by the Friction force, (Answer is -4800 J)
D) the work done by the force of gravity(Answer is 5600J)
E) the net work done on the piano(answer is 0)


Homework Equations


Fgx = sin25 x Fg
Fgy = cos25 x Fg
Ff=uFn
W=FxD
Fnet=Fa + Ff + Fgx(or Fgy)

The Attempt at a Solution


D = 4.5
mu = 0.4
Fg=2940
Fgx= -389.1
Fgy= -2914 therefore Fn= +2914
Ff = mu*Fn = -1166 N

I got the some info but... but i ain't gettin the answers ... anyone know??
 
Physics news on Phys.org
One needs to show some work here.

Start with

Fgx = sin25 x Fg
Fgy = cos25 x Fg
Ff=uFn

and enter the appropriate numbers.

There is a weight (mg) component pointing down the ramp. At the same time, friction is acting up the ramp, so the friction is helping the man by reducing the force that he is required to resist the sliding piano.

What is the force of the piano pointing down the ramp? What is the friction force pointing up the ramp? What is the difference - the force the man must apply?
 
Astronuc said:
One needs to show some work here.

Start with

Fgx = sin25 x Fg
Fgy = cos25 x Fg
Ff=uFn

and enter the appropriate numbers.

There is a weight (mg) component pointing down the ramp. At the same time, friction is acting up the ramp, so the friction is helping the man by reducing the force that he is required to resist the sliding piano.

What is the force of the piano pointing down the ramp? What is the friction force pointing up the ramp? What is the difference - the force the man must apply?

D = 4.5
mu = 0.4
Fg=2940
Fgx= -389.1
Fgy= -2914 therefore Fn= +2914
Ff = mu*Fn = +1166 N


so then Fa = Ff + Fgx??
which means Fa = 1166 - 389.1? = 776.9??
but that doesn't get me 180 N
 
O wow nvm my calculator was in radian mode srry nvm
 
mg = 300 kg * 9.81 m/s2 = 2943 N

Now of that, mg sin (25°) is pointing down the ramp.

2943 N sin (25°) = 2943 N * 0.423 = 1244 N

Pointing up the ramp is the normal component of the weight (mg cos (25°)) and the friction force is \mu = 0.4 times the normal force.

Then take the difference in magnitude (or add vectorally) and determine the force that the man must apply to achieve a zero net force to maintain constant velocity (or zero acceleration).
 
VanKwisH said:
O wow nvm my calculator was in radian mode srry nvm
It happens. One has to be careful with that, and the units.

It's best to write equations with units in order to avoid missing a conversion, especially when using mixed units, e.g. British with MKS or cgs.
 
haha thanks for explaining it anyways :D
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
Replies
11
Views
7K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
5K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
3K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
3K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
6K
Replies
2
Views
8K
Replies
4
Views
4K