Calculating work done by a bicycle

Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around calculating the work done by a bicycle compared to running. Participants explore various aspects of work, torque, and energy in the context of cycling and running, touching on both theoretical and practical considerations.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Technical explanation
  • Debate/contested

Main Points Raised

  • One participant suggests using the formula for kinetic energy, \(\frac{1}{2}I\omega^2\), to calculate work done by a bicycle, focusing on the moment of inertia of the bicycle wheel.
  • Another participant corrects this by stating that the formula represents kinetic energy, not work, and argues that constant speed riding does not require moment of inertia for work calculations.
  • A participant questions how to define the force (F) in the context of torque and suggests that the work done in running and biking might be equivalent, although they note personal experience contradicts this.
  • Further clarification is provided that torque is not dependent on moment of inertia unless there is continuous acceleration, and that torque and power are influenced by factors like wind and rolling resistance.
  • Participants discuss the biological aspects of fatigue in running versus cycling, noting that cycling is more efficient due to optimized pedals and gears, while running involves more energy loss in leg movement.
  • One participant emphasizes that running involves vertical movement, which adds complexity to the work calculation.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express differing views on the appropriate methods for calculating work done by a bicycle and the factors influencing fatigue in running versus cycling. No consensus is reached on the best approach or the equivalence of work done in both activities.

Contextual Notes

Participants highlight the importance of considering various forces, including wind resistance and rolling resistance, in the calculation of work, as well as the biological factors affecting energy expenditure in running.

Xyius
Messages
501
Reaction score
4
I run a lot and recently started cycling. I want to calculate the work done by a bicycle and compare it to the work done by running. My problem is I am having trouble calculating the work done by a bicycle. Would it simply be a matter of calculating it using the formula..

[tex]\frac{1}{2}I\omega^2[/tex]

And I would need to calculate the moment of inertia off the bicycle wheel with the center turning radius taken into account, since that is the only part of the bicycle the user moves by peddling.

Does anyone agree with this analysis? What are your opinions?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
To calculate the torque I need the moment of inertia. If I write the torque as T=Fr, then what would be F?

Here is something interesting.
W=[tex]\tau \theta = Fr\frac{x}{r} = Fx[/tex]
This is the formula for translational work. So would that suggest that it takes the same work to run and bike? That isn't true though because I get way more tired when running. :\

Unless F in the rotational sense has a different value than the translational sense.
 
Last edited:
Xyius said:
To calculate the torque I need the moment of inertia.
No, torque is not dependent on moment of inertia unless the wheels are continuously accelerating.

Torque (and power) is primarily dependent on wind and rolling resistance (unless you are going uphill!).
If I write the torque as T=Fr, then what would be F?
F is the force your feet apply to the pedals or the force the wheels apply to the road, depending on from which you want to calculate the work.
Here is something interesting.
W=[tex]\tau \theta = Fr\frac{x}{r} = Fx[/tex]
This is the formula for translational work. So would that suggest that it takes the same work to run and bike? That isn't true though because I get way more tired when running. :\

Unless F in the rotational sense has a different value than the translational sense.
The reason you get more tired running has much more to do with biology. Bicycle pedals and gears are optimized for you to efficiently apply power to them. In running a huge fraction of the power is lost just in making your legs move.
 
russ_watters said:
No, torque is not dependent on moment of inertia unless the wheels are continuously accelerating.

Torque (and power) is primarily dependent on wind and rolling resistance (unless you are going uphill!).
F is the force your feet apply to the pedals or the force the wheels apply to the road, depending on from which you want to calculate the work.
The reason you get more tired running has much more to do with biology. Bicycle pedals and gears are optimized for you to efficiently apply power to them. In running a huge fraction of the power is lost just in making your legs move.

Also remember when you are running you are also going up and down and it is the lift that needs also to be concidered
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 15 ·
Replies
15
Views
5K
  • · Replies 77 ·
3
Replies
77
Views
6K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 23 ·
Replies
23
Views
3K
  • · Replies 17 ·
Replies
17
Views
4K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
4K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
4K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K