Calculation of % component of resultant force

Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the calculation of the percentage contributions of vector components to a resultant force. Participants explore the implications of expressing vector components as percentages, particularly in the context of forces in three dimensions (x, y, z). The conversation touches on theoretical and conceptual aspects of vector representation and the mathematical relationships involved.

Discussion Character

  • Conceptual clarification
  • Debate/contested
  • Mathematical reasoning

Main Points Raised

  • One participant questions how to express the components of a resultant force as percentages, noting discrepancies in existing literature.
  • Another participant expresses skepticism about the utility of describing vector components as percentages, suggesting it may not have practical applications.
  • A participant provides calculations for the percentages of each component relative to the resultant force, indicating that the percentages do not sum to 100% when calculated directly from the components.
  • There is a discussion about the mathematical definition of vector length and how it relates to the components, with emphasis on the necessity of squaring the components to find their contributions to the resultant vector's magnitude.
  • Some participants clarify that while one can describe the components in percentage terms, the percentages may not have meaningful interpretations in the context of vector mathematics.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express differing views on the validity and practicality of representing vector components as percentages. There is no consensus on whether this approach is useful or correct, and the discussion remains unresolved regarding the implications of such representations.

Contextual Notes

Participants highlight the distinction between vectors and scalars, noting that percentages of vector components may not yield meaningful results. The discussion reflects uncertainty about the definitions and interpretations of vector contributions in percentage terms.

soundproof
Messages
2
Reaction score
0
Hi everyone,
This appears to be a trivial question but I'm uncertain to the correct answer.

If I have forces of 3N, 4N and 5N in the x,y and z directions respectively. The resultant force will be the square root of these components squared ≈ 7N. If I want to describe any of the components as a % of the resultant force, how is this done?

I have seen in a journal paper that from my example the z-component of the force is calculated as 71.4% (5/7*100) of the resultant force, while the y-component was 57% of the resultant force. The addition of these percentages is greater than 100% so this cannot be true.

If I calculate the z-component as a % of the resultant force by dividing the squares of each number (5^2/7^2*100), then the addition of each % component sums up to be 100% (x - 18%, y - 32%,z - 51%). Is this method correct and if so can someone explain to me why it is necessary to square both vectors.

Thank you
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
welcome to pf!

hi soundproof! welcome to pf! :smile:
soundproof said:
If I want to describe any of the components as a % of the resultant force, how is this done?

this seems a pretty crazy idea to me

what would be the point? :confused:

anyway … you have |F| ~ 7, F.i = 3, F.j = 4, F.k = 5

32 + 42 + 52 ~ 72,

so of course (3/7)2 + (4/7)2 + (5/7)2 ~ 1 :wink:
 
soundproof said:
Hi everyone,
This appears to be a trivial question but I'm uncertain to the correct answer.

If I have forces of 3N, 4N and 5N in the x,y and z directions respectively. The resultant force will be the square root of
the sum of
these components squared ≈ 7N. If I want to describe any of the components as a % of the resultant force, how is this done?
The magnitude of the resultant force will be \sqrt{9+ 16+ 25}= \sqrt{50}= 5\sqrt{2} which is, yes, about 7.
So the x component is about 3/7= 0.429... or about 43% of the whole, the y component is about 4/7= 0.571... or about 57% of the whole, and the z component is about 5/7= 0.714 or about 71% of the whole.

I have seen in a journal paper that from my example the z-component of the force is calculated as 71.4% (5/7*100) of the resultant force, while the y-component was 57% of the resultant force. The addition of these percentages is greater than 100% so this cannot be true.
You are reading a journal paper and cannot do basic arithmetic?? Of course, the percentages do not add to 100%, they are not numbers, they are vector components:
\sqrt{(.42)^2+(.57)^2+(.71)^2}= 1 instead.

If I calculate the z-component as a % of the resultant force by dividing the squares of each number (5^2/7^2*100), then the addition of each % component sums up to be 100% (x - 18%, y - 32%,z - 51%). Is this method correct and if so can someone explain to me why it is necessary to square both vectors.

Thank you
You cannot find a "percentage" of a vector because a vector is not a number. What you are doing is finding percentages of lengths of vectors. And the length of a vector is, by definition, the square root of the squares of the components.
 
Thank you for your replies.

Just to clarify regarding this statement -
You cannot find a "percentage" of a vector because a vector is not a number.

So, it is not correct/possible to describe a vector in terms of % contributions of x, y and z components? And this is because I am trying to relate a length/scalar to a vector?
 
soundproof said:
So, it is not correct/possible to describe a vector in terms of % contributions of x, y and z components?

you can describe anything you like, but if you want the percentages to add to 100, it's difficult to see how it could be of any practical applicaton

(we can define the efficiency of a force …

if we want something to move horizontally, but we pull on it with a rope at an angle, then the efficiency would be the horizontal component divided by the whole force)​
 

Similar threads

Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
3K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
3K
Replies
3
Views
1K
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
4K
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 25 ·
Replies
25
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
8K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K