Calculation of material properties in transformation media

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on the calculation of material properties in transformation optics, specifically regarding meta-materials and the permittivity tensor. Key equations from Schurig's paper and another referenced paper highlight discrepancies in the calculated components of the permittivity and permeability tensors in cylindrical coordinates. The transformation matrix components are detailed, and the user expresses difficulty reconciling the differences between the two sources. Participants suggest reviewing specific equations in the OE paper for clarity.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of transformation optics principles
  • Familiarity with permittivity and permeability tensors
  • Knowledge of Jacobian matrices in coordinate transformations
  • Proficiency in algebraic manipulation of tensor equations
NEXT STEPS
  • Review Schurig's paper on meta-materials for foundational concepts
  • Study the derivation of the permittivity tensor in cylindrical coordinates
  • Analyze equations 20-22 and 29-30 in the OE paper for detailed insights
  • Explore the implications of discrepancies in material property calculations
USEFUL FOR

Researchers and students in the field of optics, particularly those focusing on meta-materials and transformation optics, will benefit from this discussion.

radiofeda
Messages
4
Reaction score
0
Hi everybody,

I'm focusing on meta-materials. I have recently read Schurig's paper "http://www.opticsinfobase.org/oe/abstract.cfm?URI=OPEX-14-21-9794"). In the article, the components of the permittivity tensor are given by
[tex]\varepsilon^{i'j'} = \left|\rm{det}(\Lambda^{i'}_{i})\right|^{-1} \Lambda^{i'}_{i} \Lambda^{j'}_{j} \varepsilon^{ij}[/tex]
where the Jacobian matrix
[tex]\Lambda_{\alpha}^{\alpha'} = \frac{\partial x^{\alpha'}}{\partial x^{\alpha}}[/tex]
and the roman indices run from1 to 3, for the three spatial coordinates, as is standard practice.

Working out the algebra, the components of the permittivity (permeability) tensor can be obtained by
[tex]\left(\varepsilon^{i'j'}\right) = \left|\rm{det}\left(\Lambda\right)\right|^{-1}\Lambda^T \Lambda[/tex]
where [tex]\Lambda[/tex] is a matrix, which components are the counterpart of the contravariant coefficients [tex]\Lambda_{\alpha}^{\alpha'}[/tex].

For cylindrical cloak, the components of the transformation matrix are
[tex]\left(\Lambda^{i'}_{j}\right) = \left(<br /> \begin{array}{ccc}<br /> \frac{\rho'}{\rho}-\frac{ax^2}{\rho^3} & -\frac{axy}{\rho^3} & 0 \\<br /> -\frac{ayx}{\rho^3} & \frac{\rho'}{\rho}-\frac{ay^2}{\rho^3} & 0 \\<br /> 0 & 0 & 1 \\<br /> \end{array}<br /> \right)[/tex]
It is easy to find the material properties. For instance, the z component of the permittivity tensor is
[tex]\varepsilon_z = \varepsilon^{3,3} = \frac{\rho^2}{\rho'(\rho'-a)} = \frac{1}{\left|\rm{det}\left(\Lambda\right)\right|}[/tex]

However, in the paper "http://pre.aps.org/abstract/PRE/v74/i3/e036621" ), the components of the relative permittivity and permeability tensor specified in cylindrical coordinates are given
[tex]\varepsilon_z = \mu_z = \left(\frac{b}{b-a}\right)^2 \frac{\rho-a}{\rho}[/tex]

It can be seen that the two formula are not equal obviously. And the other nonzero components of the permittivity and permeability tensor are not equal too.

I have deduced the formulas for many times. Depressingly, I can not figure out the problem. Could somebody please give me some comments on the calculation of material properties in transformation optics.

Regards.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Physics news on Phys.org
I just glanced through the papers, but I wonder if you are looking in the wrong place: see, for example, eqns 20-22 and 29-30 in the OE paper.
 
Andy Resnick said:
I just glanced through the papers, but I wonder if you are looking in the wrong place: see, for example, eqns 20-22 and 29-30 in the OE paper.
I see. However, it seems not easy to obtain eq.(29) from eq.(26) by applying eq.(6) or (7).
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
4K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
5K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
7K
  • · Replies 0 ·
Replies
0
Views
2K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K