Calculation of the field due to a dipole at an arbitrary point

AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around deriving the electric field at a point due to a dipole using both potential and the contributions from positive and negative charges. The user initially calculates the electric field using the gradient of the potential, resulting in a scalar expression. They then attempt to derive the electric field components along and perpendicular to the radial direction but struggle to eliminate the angles involved. After some back-and-forth, they clarify the distance between charges and apply the cosine rule, ultimately resolving their confusion. The conversation highlights the importance of distinguishing between scalar and vector fields in electric field calculations.
Hamiltonian
Messages
296
Reaction score
193
Homework Statement
Calculate the magnitude of the field due to a dipole at a point P which is at a distance ##r## from the midpoint of the two charges and makes an angle ##\theta## with the dipole moment Vector ##P##. the distances between the two opposite charges is ##a## and ##(a<<r)##.
Relevant Equations
-
I know how to derive field using ##E = -\nabla V## in polar coordinates and doing so gave me $$E = (kP/r^3)(1 + 3cos^3\theta)^{1/2}$$

now I am trying to derive ##E## at point P using the fields produced by +ve and -ve charge respectively and taking components of each along the radial direction along ##r## and perpendicular to ##r##. I assumed angles ##\alpha## and ##\beta## with the perpendicular to the radial direction in hopes they get eliminated when finding ##E_{net}##.
1618064353633.png

$$E_+ = \frac {kq}{r^2} (1+ (2a/r) cos\theta)$$
$$E_- = \frac {kq}{r^2} (1- (2a/r) cos\theta)$$
here ##E_+## and ##E_-## are fields due to the -ve and +ve charges at point P.
$$E_r = E_+ sin\beta - E_- simn\alpha$$
$$E_{r'} = E_+ cos\beta + E_- cos\alpha$$
here ##E_r## is the componetnt of ##E_{net}## at P along ##r## and ##E_{r'}## is the component of ##E_{net}## perpendicular to ##r##.
$$| E_{net}| = \sqrt{(E_r)^2 + (E_{r'})^2}$$
I am not able to eliminate ##\alpha## and ##\beta## from the final expression for ##E_{net}##.
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Likes Delta2
Physics news on Phys.org
Hamiltonian299792458 said:
I know how to derive field using E=−∇V in polar coordinates and doing so gave me E=(kP/r3)(1+3cos3θ)1/2
This doesn’t seem right. You have given a scalar, but the electric field is a vector field. Please show your work
 
Orodruin said:
This doesn’t seem right. You have given a scalar, but the electric field is a vector field. Please show your work
I forgot to put an arrow on top of ##E##:sorry:
$$\vec E = -\nabla V$$

although my doubt wasn't related to this, this is what I did
$$V_p = (kPcos\theta)/r^2$$
$$ |\vec E| = \sqrt{(-\frac{\partial V}{\partial r})^2 + (-\frac{1}{r}\frac {\partial V}{\partial \theta})^2} = \frac{kP}{r^3}\sqrt{1+3cos^2\theta}$$
 
.
Hamiltonian299792458 said:
View attachment 281253
$$E_+ = \frac {kq}{r^2} (1+ (2a/r) cos\theta)$$
$$E_- = \frac {kq}{r^2} (1- (2a/r) cos\theta)$$
I don't think the factors of 2 are correct in the right-hand sides of these two equations. Post your work if you would like us to check it.

$$E_r = E_+ sin\beta - E_- sin\alpha$$
$$E_{r'} = E_+ cos\beta + E_- cos\alpha$$

I am not able to eliminate ##\alpha## and ##\beta##
Try to relate ##\beta## and ##\theta##. Hint: apply the law of sines to one of the triangles in your figure.
 
  • Like
Likes Hamiltonian
TSny said:
.
I don't think the factors of 2 are correct in the right-hand sides of these two equations. Post your work if you would like us to check it.
the distance between the two opposite charges is ##2a##
applying the cosine rule to both the triangles gives
$$r_+^2 = r^2 + a^2 -2arcos\theta \approx r^2 -2arcos\theta$$
$$r_-^2 = r^2 +a^2 -2arcos\theta \approx r^2 +2arcos\theta$$

also after applying the sine rule to both the triangles and making a few approximations I was able to get the required answer thanks!
 
the distance between the two opposite charges is ##2a##
OK. In the original post, the distance is given to be ##a## rather than ##2a##. That accounts for why I thought you were off by a factor of 2. I'm glad everything worked out.
 
  • Like
Likes Hamiltonian
Hamiltonian299792458 said:
I forgot to put an arrow on top of ##E##:sorry:
$$\vec E = -\nabla V$$

although my doubt wasn't related to this, this is what I did
$$V_p = (kPcos\theta)/r^2$$
$$ |\vec E| = \sqrt{(-\frac{\partial V}{\partial r})^2 + (-\frac{1}{r}\frac {\partial V}{\partial \theta})^2} = \frac{kP}{r^3}\sqrt{1+3cos^2\theta}$$
My concern was not the missing arrow, it was the fact that your computed ##E## is a scalar field and not a vector.
Hamiltonian299792458 said:
and doing so gave me $$E = (kP/r^3)(1 + 3cos^3\theta)^{1/2}$$
 
Orodruin said:
My concern was not the missing arrow, it was the fact that your computed ##E## is a scalar field and not a vector.
the question states calculate the magnitude of the electric field due to an electric dipole at a point ##P##

$$|\vec E| = \frac{kP}{r^3}(1+ 3 cos^2\theta)^{1/2}$$
 
Back
Top