Calculation of torque of engine (mathematically)

Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the mathematical calculation of torque for a compressed air engine, particularly in the context of a previous project where measurements were taken but the setup is no longer available for direct experimentation. Participants explore various formulas and considerations necessary for estimating torque based on RPM and cylinder pressure.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Technical explanation
  • Debate/contested
  • Mathematical reasoning

Main Points Raised

  • One participant suggests a formula for torque based on force on the piston and crank radius, questioning if this approach is justified given the available data.
  • Another participant highlights the numerous unknowns and variables affecting torque, emphasizing the difficulty of accurate determination without direct testing methods like a dynamometer.
  • A different participant acknowledges the general approach but indicates that the application of force may not be straightforward, depending on how the compressed air is applied.
  • One participant provides a formula for output power and torque, noting assumptions about mean effective pressure and the operational characteristics of the engine.
  • Another participant discusses the implications of early cut-off in the power stroke and suggests a lower factor for mean effective pressure under uncertain conditions.
  • A participant mentions the challenges of predicting torque values due to the nature of the engine's operation and suggests that having detailed engine data could aid in estimating peak cylinder pressures.
  • One participant seeks clarification on the term "number revs/second," indicating a potential misunderstanding or need for further explanation.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express a range of views on the feasibility and accuracy of calculating torque from the given parameters. There is no consensus on the best approach, and multiple competing perspectives on the factors influencing torque remain evident throughout the discussion.

Contextual Notes

Participants note various limitations, including the dependence on assumptions about engine efficiency, the impact of design specifics, and the challenges posed by the lack of direct experimental data.

Swamini Chopra
Messages
1
Reaction score
0
We have tried to convert a petrol engine into a compressed air engine back in our graduation project. At that time we only measured the RPM of engine using tachometer and pressure of compressed air using pressure gauge. Now, we need to know the power of wngine at those readings. As the setup is long gone and we cannot duplicate the trials again, can you please suggest me how to determine the torque by mathematical calculations? I am thinking of using following series of formula:

Torque (of engine) = Force (on piston) x Radius (of crank travel)
Force (on piston) = Pressure (of air) / Area (of piston head)

Please tell me that can this calculation be justified?
 
Engineering news on Phys.org
Hi,
There are a lot of unknowns and variables that will affect the engines torque, but unless the engine was tested on a dyno or used to propel a vehicle fitted with the appropriate sensors, then it will be practically impossible to accurately determine its torque using only RPM and cylinder pressure.

Number of pistons, rotational mass, frictional losses, volumetric efficiency, crank angle, parasitic losses(If 4 stroke multiple cylinder engine, then some cylinders will use some power during compression stroke), cylinder leakage... These are just a few things that need consideration when trying to determine just how much torque is generated.

Best of luck with your project
J Mc
 
He says its a compressed air engine with gauge pressure measued... so he can get bloody close.

OP the general approach is right depending on how you applied the compressed air. A pneumatic shot, a constant feed.

Draw the problem out (ie a piston and conrod). Why is directly applying Fxd not quite right in this case?
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: karan_s
From an earlier thread :

Output power = Area of piston * Length of stroke * Mean effective pressure * number of power strokes/rev * Number of revs/second .

Output Torque = Output Power / ( Number of revs/second * 2 * Pi )

Mean effective pressure can be taken as about 0.85 * supply pressure .

Number of power strokes/rev is 1 for a single cylinder single acting engine .

The above assumes that the practical arrangement of engine and flywheel allow it to work smoothly and continuously .
 
Last edited:
The 0.85 factor assumes admission of air for most of power stroke . When there is early cut off this factor has to be reduced . If you have no certain information about cut off then use 0.4 .

Probably not nescessary for present purposes but given detail drawings of the engine a good estimate of the shape of the actual P-V diagram for the power stroke could be drawn .
 
Last edited:
It sounds like from your original post that you now need to present some data for an experiment that has been disposed of. If that is true the formulas that Nidum presented should work very well for you although as an interpretation not measured data. If you are attempting to move forward with some design process based on the experiment I believe that you will encounter some variations. More than likely this comes into play from the conversion used. Peak torque is concurrent with the point where a combustion engine is operating at peak volumetric efficiency. Four stroke engines typically operate at around 0.8 for a 2 valve, 0.85 for a 4 valve, and 0.9 for a 5 valve. These values being with a naturally aspirated engine. When you introduce forced induction the values are consistently above 1. I am assuming that your compressed air engine had no actual combustion but only ran on the force created by induction air acting on the piston. This change makes the actual values challenging to accurately predict. However if you have cam timing and overlap data one could possibly interpolate where peak cylinder pressures would occur.
 
What is "number revs/second"
 

Similar threads

Replies
13
Views
5K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 19 ·
Replies
19
Views
14K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
3K
  • · Replies 45 ·
2
Replies
45
Views
7K
Replies
6
Views
5K
Replies
2
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 18 ·
Replies
18
Views
8K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
11K