Calculation -- Torque to slow down heavy spinning reel

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

This discussion focuses on designing a brake system for a heavy reel weighing 2500 lbs, spinning at 53 RPM while the truck moves at 15 mph. Key calculations involve determining the energy in the spinning reel using the formula 1/2*mv^2, where v is calculated as 2*pi*Radius*RPM/60. The current design employs a drum brake, which is inefficient for quick assembly and disassembly. A suggestion is made to consider a car disk brake system for its cost-effectiveness and efficiency, along with the importance of calculating the necessary pressure for hydraulic systems to stop the reel.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of rotational dynamics and energy calculations
  • Familiarity with brake system types, specifically drum and disk brakes
  • Knowledge of hydraulic systems and pressure calculations
  • Basic proficiency in using Excel for computations
NEXT STEPS
  • Research the design principles of hydraulic brake systems
  • Learn about the coefficient of friction and its impact on braking force
  • Explore the application of car disk brakes in heavy machinery
  • Study the dynamics of rotational motion and energy dissipation
USEFUL FOR

Engineers, mechanical designers, and anyone involved in the design and optimization of braking systems for heavy machinery and vehicles.

JST2014
Messages
2
Reaction score
0
I am designing a brake system for big reel that weighs about 2500lb, spinning down on a truck that is moving at 15mph, the shaft is 2.5inch in diameter. It is rotating at 53RPM and it comes to a stop at about 45 seconds.

How do i start performing calculations and the design parameters?

Thanks
 
Engineering news on Phys.org
Hi JST2014! and welcome to PF.

A reel diameter would be nice!. I will suppose a 3m diameter for most of my post.

You will need to know how much energy is in the spinning reel which will tell you what force and disk diameter to choose.

Before all, I am wondering why can you not use a normal car disk brake system (used car lot). A normal car weights around 3200lbs and can stop from 40 - 0 mph in around 10 s (a gentle brake). The disk will need an adapter for your shaft and the caliper a support. The rest will work nicely and considering the low cost of already made parts you can always slap on two disks if the necessity arises.

You can work out the energy by using 1/2*mv^2, just that v=2*pi*Radius*RPM/60 (where the radius is the distance from the center of gravity of a slice of the reel (usually looks like a rectangle) to the axis of rotation.
The energy/time will give you the power necessary to be absorbed by the braking system and will go on to determine the other factors which are overly complicated. Honestly the setup seems slow and low on energy and one car break should be more than adequate.
 
Hey Lok, thanks for the swift reply.

The reel diameter is approximately 91.5inches in diameter. It can spin in a pretty fast manner when traveling down the road. The current design utilizes a drum brake and it takes up way to much time (given tight shaft tolerances) to assemble and disassemble, i am thinking of having a quick assembly.

One quick question, is there a way i can obtain the pressure that is needed (if some sort of hydraulic air system is used) to stop the reel from rotation?
 
JST2014 said:
The current design utilizes a drum brake and it takes up way to much time (given tight shaft tolerances) to assemble and disassemble, i am thinking of having a quick assembly.

One quick question, is there a way i can obtain the pressure that is needed (if some sort of hydraulic air system is used) to stop the reel from rotation?

For the first issue of assem/disassem could you just place the brake on a separate shaft and connect the two shafts by an easy to disconnect chain drive?

The second has no simple answers. I estimated a few values and simplified a few formulas in an excel file and clearly did not know about the upload any file capability of PF, so I made a JPG also.

This would be the broad and distant picture about your braking necessities. For more I would recommend seeking a Book about designing a breaking system. And after 2 weeks of hardcore computations you will have a running system idea that might not apply from a spatial point of view :P

Edit: I forgot to put the coefficient of friction between steel/steel for the Friction force. It is around 0.8 so the Normal force (and pressure) needs to be 1.25 higher to achieve the same effect.
 

Attachments

  • Brake stuff.xlsx
    Brake stuff.xlsx
    10.1 KB · Views: 343
  • Brake.jpg
    Brake.jpg
    41.9 KB · Views: 584
Last edited:

Similar threads

Replies
3
Views
5K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
5K
  • · Replies 19 ·
Replies
19
Views
4K
  • · Replies 104 ·
4
Replies
104
Views
12K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 24 ·
Replies
24
Views
4K
  • · Replies 19 ·
Replies
19
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
7K