Calculations of Significant Figures

Join the discussion
Ask a follow-up here, or get your own question answered by working scientists, mathematicians and engineers — people, not an autocomplete.
Real named experts · corrections over time · the nuance an AI answer skips
1 reply · 10K views
playgames
Messages
1
Reaction score
1
A rectangular plate has a length of (21.3[itex]\pm[/itex]0.2) cm and a
width of (9.80[itex]\pm[/itex]0.1) cm. Find the area of the plate and the
uncertainty in the calculated area.

Solution
Area = lw = (21.3[itex]\pm[/itex]0.2 cm) X (9.80[itex]\pm[/itex]0.1 cm)
[itex]\cong[/itex](21.3 X 9.80 [itex]\pm[/itex] 21.3 X 0.1 [itex]\pm[/itex] 0.2 X 9.80) cm^2
[itex]\cong[/itex](209 [itex]\pm[/itex]4) cm^2

Because the input data were given to only three significant
figures, we cannot claim any more in our result. Do you see
why we did not need to multiply the uncertainties 0.2 cm and
0.1 cm?
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: lookingforcj
Physics news on Phys.org
welcome to pf!

hi playgames! welcome to pf! :smile:

(try using the X2 icon just above the Reply box :wink:)
playgames said:
Solution
Area = lw = (21.3[itex]\pm[/itex]0.2 cm) X (9.80[itex]\pm[/itex]0.1 cm)
[itex]\cong[/itex](21.3 X 9.80 [itex]\pm[/itex] 21.3 X 0.1 [itex]\pm[/itex] 0.2 X 9.80) cm^2
[itex]\cong[/itex](209 [itex]\pm[/itex]4) cm^2

Do you see why we did not need to multiply the uncertainties 0.2 cm and
0.1 cm?

because it's too small ever to be of significance …

0.2 * 0.1 = 0.02, which is two orders of magnitude smaller than anything else :wink:

(if you've done calculus, this is similar to writing (x + dx)(y + dy) = xy + xdy + ydx, and ignoring the dxdy as being "second-order")

the 21.3 X 9.80 is "ordinary", the 21.3 X 0.1 and 0.2 X 9.80 are "first-order" of smallness, and the missing 0.2 X 0.1 is "second-order" of smallness
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: lookingforcj