Does a Rectangle's Area Always Increase with Its Perimeter?

  • Thread starter Thread starter circa415
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Calculus Geometry
AI Thread Summary
The discussion clarifies that a rectangle's area does not always increase with its perimeter. A specific example is provided using a square and a degenerate rectangle, demonstrating that while the perimeter can increase, the area can remain zero. The concept is further illustrated with rectangles parameterized by x, showing varying areas despite changes in perimeter. This highlights the non-linear relationship between perimeter and area in rectangles. Overall, the conclusion is that an increase in perimeter does not guarantee an increase in area.
circa415
Messages
20
Reaction score
0
If the perimeter of a rectangle increases, does the area necessarily increase?

Can anyone explain this using calculus?
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
No it does not, and you don't need calculus to find the answer:
Let's say you've got a square initially with side "a".
Then, you look at the degenerate rectangle with two sides 3a, and the other two length 0.

The perimeter of the degenerate rectangle is 3a+0+3a+0=6a, that is, greater than your original square's 4a, yet the rectangle's area is zero..
 
Think of a rectangle with corners at (0,0), (0,1/x), (x,1/x), (x,0). Draw a picture-one corner at the origin the opposite on the graph 1/x.

Now we get an entire family of rectangles parameterized by x>0. What can you say about the area of these guys? What about the perimiter as x varies?
 
Thread 'Video on imaginary numbers and some queries'
Hi, I was watching the following video. I found some points confusing. Could you please help me to understand the gaps? Thanks, in advance! Question 1: Around 4:22, the video says the following. So for those mathematicians, negative numbers didn't exist. You could subtract, that is find the difference between two positive quantities, but you couldn't have a negative answer or negative coefficients. Mathematicians were so averse to negative numbers that there was no single quadratic...
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...
Thread 'Unit Circle Double Angle Derivations'
Here I made a terrible mistake of assuming this to be an equilateral triangle and set 2sinx=1 => x=pi/6. Although this did derive the double angle formulas it also led into a terrible mess trying to find all the combinations of sides. I must have been tired and just assumed 6x=180 and 2sinx=1. By that time, I was so mindset that I nearly scolded a person for even saying 90-x. I wonder if this is a case of biased observation that seeks to dis credit me like Jesus of Nazareth since in reality...
Back
Top