Calculus, by Larson, Hostetler, and Edwards.

  • Thread starter Thread starter Gauged
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Calculus
AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers around the suitability of the textbook "Calculus" by Larson, Hostetler, and Edwards for self-studying calculus, particularly for someone aiming to major in physics after community college. The original poster expresses a desire to build a strong mathematical foundation before tackling physics concepts, having previously self-studied pre-calculus. While some participants acknowledge the book's adequacy for initial calculus studies, they also suggest exploring other resources and older texts for potentially better explanations and examples. The conversation highlights the importance of evaluating different materials and emphasizes that after the first three semesters of calculus, further studies should include Linear Algebra and Ordinary Differential Equations (ODEs) to prepare for advanced physics coursework. Overall, the focus is on ensuring a solid mathematical background to facilitate understanding in physics.
Gauged
Messages
22
Reaction score
0
I have a relatively simple question to ask anyone so inclined to give me an answer. I recently finished self teaching pre-calculus with the text Algebra and Trigonometry, by Beecher, Penna, and Bittinger, which is an excellent self study text I might add. The book I have chosen to graduate onto is, as you can probably guess, Calculus, by Larson, Hostetler, and Edwards. My question, before I delve right in is, would this text be a good book to start learning calculus with every intention of graduating from community college to major in physics at a university? My long term intent is to develope a very solid base in mathematics before I start on the road toward a physics degree, and I am not sure if there is another standard of mathematical technique I am missing in my preparations for the graduate curriculum. For the most part, time is on my side, I do not feel the need to rush into things, and very much want to have a deeper understanding of the physical concepts, insofar as math is concerned, at least, which is why I am self studying before taking further 'qualified learning' (in order to avoid the concurrent math-physics stuggle). Any suggestions about this would be much appreciated, thanks.
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
This is book that I was taught calculus from and with all honesty I was not a big fan of it. Its not a "bad" calculus book, but I thought many of the examples and explanations were lacking. Crack it open and see how well you can follow it. Don't be affraid to hit up a discount book store and browse through different and perhaps older books either (sometimes in math, the older is better). Couple sites on the internet you may want to try as well.

http://www.math.ncsu.edu/calculus/web/videos.html
http://tutor-homework.com/Math_Help/Calculus.html
http://www.math.armstrong.edu/faculty/hollis/calcvideos/
http://www.clarku.edu/~djoyce/trig/

Have fun learing this wonderful subject!
 
If the book edition is anything like the earlier one published in the early '80's, then it should be very acceptable for self-study. The book should be fine for the first three semesters of Calculus Plus Analytic Geometry.
 
Thank you for your replies, though I suppose the obveous follow up question would be, what comes after the first three semesters of calculus, excluding analytic geometry, in terms of a physics major? Not that I am thinking about self studying up to/past that point (possible?), but purely to satisfy a curiosity.
 
Last edited:
Linear Algebra and ODE's are your next stop on the math train.
 
Much to learn still, much to learn... bring it on. :cool:
 
I’ve been looking through the curricula of several European theoretical/mathematical physics MSc programs (ETH, Oxford, Cambridge, LMU, ENS Paris, etc), and I’m struck by how little emphasis they place on advanced fundamental courses. Nearly everything seems to be research-adjacent: string theory, quantum field theory, quantum optics, cosmology, soft matter physics, black hole radiation, etc. What I don’t see are the kinds of “second-pass fundamentals” I was hoping for, things like...
TL;DR Summary: I want to do a PhD in applied math but I hate group theory, is this a big problem? Hello, I am a second-year math and physics double major with a minor in data science. I just finished group theory (today actually), and it was my least favorite class in all of university so far. It doesn't interest me, and I am also very bad at it compared to other math courses I have done. The other courses I have done are calculus I-III, ODEs, Linear Algebra, and Prob/Stats. Is it a...

Similar threads

Replies
9
Views
2K
Replies
16
Views
2K
Replies
33
Views
2K
Replies
4
Views
2K
Replies
5
Views
3K
Replies
29
Views
2K
Back
Top