MHB Calculus: Maximum point for revenue function

Doffy
Messages
12
Reaction score
0
Hello (Smile). I have been stuck on this question for a while.

A company charges $550 for a transistor set on orders of 50 or less sets. The charge is reduced by $5 per set for each order in excess of 50 sets. Find the largest size order company should allow so as to receive a maximum revenue.

I have tried to formulate the revenue function as: R(x) = (550 -5x) x, for x > 50.
Am I right? The answer mentioned in book is 80 sets.
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
Your revenue function isn't right...we are only subtracting \$5 per set in excess of 50 ordered, hence:

$$R(x)=x(550-(x-50)5)$$

So, simplify and factor, and then you know that the vertex will lie on the axis of symmetry which will be midway between the two roots.
 
Ok, I understand now. Thanks for helping.
 
Doffy said:
Ok, I understand now. Thanks for helping.

What we should actually write for the revenue function is a piecewise defined function:

$$R(n)=\begin{cases}550n, & 0<n<51 \\[3pt] 5n(160-n), & 50<n \\ \end{cases}$$

I used $n$ rather than $x$ to indicate that the independent variable is discrete rather than continuous. Then we may plot this function:

View attachment 5104

We see that the linear portion of the function increases at a constant rate (given by the slope of the line), and then we should observe that the parabolic portion of the function opens downward (since the coefficient of the squared term is negative) and so its maximum will be at the vertex, which lies on the axis of symmetry, which will be midway between the roots, at $n=0$ and $n=160$, which is:

$$n=\frac{0+160}{2}=80$$

Since this value is to the right of where the linear and parabolic portions "meet," we may conclude:

$$R_{\max}=R(80)$$
 

Attachments

  • piecewise_revenue.png
    piecewise_revenue.png
    7 KB · Views: 98
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...
Fermat's Last Theorem has long been one of the most famous mathematical problems, and is now one of the most famous theorems. It simply states that the equation $$ a^n+b^n=c^n $$ has no solutions with positive integers if ##n>2.## It was named after Pierre de Fermat (1607-1665). The problem itself stems from the book Arithmetica by Diophantus of Alexandria. It gained popularity because Fermat noted in his copy "Cubum autem in duos cubos, aut quadratoquadratum in duos quadratoquadratos, et...
Thread 'Imaginary Pythagorus'
I posted this in the Lame Math thread, but it's got me thinking. Is there any validity to this? Or is it really just a mathematical trick? Naively, I see that i2 + plus 12 does equal zero2. But does this have a meaning? I know one can treat the imaginary number line as just another axis like the reals, but does that mean this does represent a triangle in the complex plane with a hypotenuse of length zero? Ibix offered a rendering of the diagram using what I assume is matrix* notation...
Back
Top