Calculusvolume with cross sections

  • Thread starter calchelpplz
  • Start date
  • Tags
    Cross
In summary, the person is trying to teach themselves calculus and is stuck on this problem. They set up an equation using x and y values and then attempted to find the volume using the cross sections to be squares. However, they got lost and are now wondering if they did everything correctly. After checking that they did everything correctly, they integrate the equation to find the volume. However, they are still confused about the height of the triangle. They set up the equation to find the height of the triangle and then used that information to find the volume. However, they are still confused about the height of the triangle.
  • #1
calchelpplz
8
0
I need help please on a calculus problem. I am trying to teach myself and am doing fair. I am stuck on this though.

Question:find the volume using CROSS SECTIONS that are squares.
base is bounded by
y = x + 1
y = x squared - 1
cross sections are squares
perpendicular to the x axis

I know to use the area = side squared due to it being a square
I set the 2 equations equal to find the integral goes from -1 to 2

I took the top minus bottom to get equation of (x + 1 ) - ( x squared - 1)
which becomes all squared due to the definition of area of a square

so I get x^4 - x^3 -2x^2 -x^3 +x^2 +2x -2x^2 +2x +4
then I combine like terms and integrate?
I don't get the answer
answer should be 8.1 it says.

thanks in advance.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
  • #2
If my head hasn't fallen off you should have:

[tex][(x+1)-(x^2-1)]^2=-3x^2+4x-2x^3+4x+x^4[/itex]

[tex]\int_{-1}^2 -3x^2+4x-2x^3+4x+x^4\;dx=?[/tex]

What do you get for that?
 
Last edited:
  • #3
yes, I got that except one of the 4x I had 4 instead

so, if that is correct...
then I do the integral math, find that
then I plug in 2
then I plug in -1
and subtract the two answers?
 
  • #4
Schrodinger's Dog said:
If my head hasn't fallen off you should have:

[tex][(x+1)-(x^2-1)]^2=-3x^2+4x-2x^3+4x+x^4[/itex]
Was that a typo (or has your head fallen off?)
[tex][((x+1)- (x^2-1))^2= (-x^2+ x+ 2)^2= x^4-2x^3+ 4x+4[/tex]
You don't need "4x" twice!

[tex][\int_{-1}^2 -3x^2+4x-2x^3+4x+x^4\;dx=?[/tex]

What do you get for that?
 
  • #5
HallsofIvy said:
Was that a typo (or has your head fallen off?)
[tex][((x+1)- (x^2-1))^2= (-x^2+ x+ 2)^2= x^4-2x^3+ 4x+4[/tex]
You don't need "4x" twice!

Yeah I think it was apologies it should have been just +4.

Puts head back on. :redface:

[tex]\int_{-1}^2 -3x^2+4x-2x^3+4+x^4\;dx=?[/tex]

calchelpplease said:
yes, I got that except one of the 4x I had 4 instead

so, if that is correct...
then I do the integral math, find that
then I plug in 2
then I plug in -1
and subtract the two answers?

Yes that's correct, sorry for the mistake. :frown:
 
Last edited:
  • #6
ok, thanks everyone.

I guess I must have done something wrong but get the answer now.
Of course I should have asked the next question first as now I am stuck on it. Can you post more than one question a day or is that considered a 'no can do' thing?
 
  • #7
calchelpplease said:
ok, thanks everyone.

I guess I must have done something wrong but get the answer now.
Of course I should have asked the next question first as now I am stuck on it. Can you post more than one question a day or is that considered a 'no can do' thing?

Certainly, as long as you show working, or, at least indicate where you're totally flummoxed, you can post as many as you like. You might not always get a quick reply but be patient.
 
  • #8
oh wow that is great.

Do I start a new post then or continue with this one?
I guess you can tell it is my first day here at ye old physics forum
 
  • #9
calchelpplease said:
oh wow that is great.

Do I start a new post then or continue with this one?
I guess you can tell it is my first day here at ye old physics forum

Welcome to PF.

And yeah just tack it on the end, is probably easier in this case, people will notice the bump generally.
 
  • #10
ok, here goes:

Cross sections for volumes method only:
question:
given
y = x cubed
y = 0
x = 1
cross sections are equilateral triangles
perpendicular to the y axis

so first I think (watch out) that when it says perpendicular to the y-axis you use y values on your integral but have to solve any equations using x = to calculate your area.

so I solved for x = third root of y
(the top of the graph is this equation then.)

NOW, I get muddled big time.
It seems I have a triangle with the side of it defined as the third root of y.
so I found the height of an equilateral given that as my side
I got x on the square root of 3 all divided by 2.

I would then use this value as my 'x' in the area = 1/2 b*h
so
1/2 (third root of y) (third root of y)(square root of 3) = area?

am I totally off here?
 
  • #11
Not totally off, but if b is a base of an equilateral triangle then the height is b*sqrt(3)/2. So (1/2)bh=?. I think you are missing a factor of 2, aren't you?
 
  • #12
ok, I see that height is b times square root of 3 all over 2
so area is (square root of 3 )divided by four, times b squared.
is my side of the triangle equal to that top graph which is x = cube root of y?

do I set b = cube root of y and use those values in the area calculation?
Obviously I have to get the equation in there.
I have a hard time with the visual here.
 
  • #13
calchelpplease said:
ok, here goes:

Cross sections for volumes method only:
question:
given
y = x cubed
y = 0
x = 1
cross sections are equilateral triangles
perpendicular to the y axis

so first I think (watch out) that when it says perpendicular to the y-axis you use y values on your integral but have to solve any equations using x = to calculate your area.

so I solved for x = third root of y
(the top of the graph is this equation then.)

NOW, I get muddled big time.
It seems I have a triangle with the side of it defined as the third root of y.
No. One side of the base figure is y= x3 or x= x1/3. The other end of that base is x= 1. The length of the base of a triangle is 1- x1/3, NOT "x1/3".

so I found the height of an equilateral given that as my side
I got x on the square root of 3 all divided by 2.

I would then use this value as my 'x' in the area = 1/2 b*h
so
1/2 (third root of y) (third root of y)(square root of 3) = area?

am I totally off here?
 
  • #14
I can't tell by reading the problem statement. All I see is that it says that the triangle is perpendicular to the y axis. It doesn't say that y^(1/3) is the side of the triangle, or the height of the triangle or whatever. Unless it says more you'll have to guess or ask for clarification.
 
  • #15
HallsofIvy said:
No. One side of the base figure is y= x3 or x= x1/3. The other end of that base is x= 1. The length of the base of a triangle is 1- x1/3, NOT "x1/3".

Uh, good point, if you read it that way. I took the x=1 as a misprint for y=1. calchelpplease, how exactly did you quote that problem?
 
  • #16
oops
I was totally seeing it wrong.
Is it that the base is 1 minus (y to the 1/3)? (you had x to the 1/3)
If so I think I see it now.

thanks!
 
  • #17
Cross sections for volumes method only:
question:
given
y = x cubed
y = 0
x = 1
cross sections are equilateral triangles
perpendicular to the y axis

no typo...
so is the base equal to 1-(cubed root of y)
and my height is that base (1 - cubed root of y) , times the (cubed root of 3 )over 2?
 

1. What is calculus volume with cross sections?

Calculus volume with cross sections is a mathematical concept that involves finding the volume of a three-dimensional object by using cross-sectional areas. This method is commonly used when the shape of the object is irregular or when the object is made up of multiple shapes.

2. How do you calculate volume using cross sections?

To calculate volume using cross sections, you first need to find the area of each cross section. Then, you integrate these areas over the length or height of the object. The result will be the volume of the object.

3. What are some common shapes used in calculus volume with cross sections?

Some common shapes used in calculus volume with cross sections are rectangles, triangles, circles, and semicircles. These shapes are often used because their areas can be easily calculated.

4. Can calculus volume with cross sections be used for any three-dimensional object?

Yes, calculus volume with cross sections can be used for any three-dimensional object, as long as the object can be broken down into smaller, simpler shapes. This method is particularly useful for finding the volume of irregular or complex objects.

5. Why is calculus volume with cross sections important?

Calculus volume with cross sections is important because it allows us to find the volume of objects that cannot be easily measured or calculated using traditional methods. It is also a fundamental concept in many fields of science and engineering, such as physics, chemistry, and architecture.

Similar threads

  • Calculus and Beyond Homework Help
Replies
12
Views
934
  • Calculus and Beyond Homework Help
Replies
10
Views
282
  • Calculus and Beyond Homework Help
Replies
2
Views
478
  • Calculus and Beyond Homework Help
Replies
15
Views
1K
  • Calculus and Beyond Homework Help
Replies
15
Views
744
  • Calculus and Beyond Homework Help
Replies
1
Views
416
  • Calculus and Beyond Homework Help
Replies
4
Views
841
  • Calculus and Beyond Homework Help
Replies
5
Views
82
  • Calculus and Beyond Homework Help
Replies
13
Views
1K
  • Calculus and Beyond Homework Help
Replies
9
Views
1K
Back
Top