MHB Does 2+2 Really Equal 5 in Certain Conditions?

  • Thread starter Thread starter Amer
  • Start date Start date
AI Thread Summary
The discussion explores the concept of truth and reality as depicted in George Orwell's "1984," particularly through the dialogue between Winston and O'Brien. It highlights how totalitarian ideologies manipulate perceptions of reality, suggesting that beliefs can distort fundamental truths, such as the mathematical statement 2+2=4. The conversation draws parallels between Orwell's themes and contemporary ideologies, including humanism, which are often accepted without question. Participants reflect on the insidious nature of ideology and its impact on understanding reality. Ultimately, the thread emphasizes the importance of questioning widely accepted beliefs.
Amer
Messages
259
Reaction score
0
Mathematics news on Phys.org
I really didn't understand the point.
 
It talks about dictators, i think
 
Ok, I get it now. Lol, I was like what did math have to do with crazy people?
 
O'Brien:
It is impossible to see reality except by looking through the eyes of the Party.​
Winston:
How can I help seeing what is in front of my eyes? Two and two are four."​
O'Brien:
Sometimes, Winston. Sometimes they are five. Sometimes they are three. Sometimes they are all of them at once. You must try harder. It is not easy to become sane.​
 
SuperSonic4 said:
O'Brien:
It is impossible to see reality except by looking through the eyes of the Party.​
Winston:
How can I help seeing what is in front of my eyes? Two and two are four."​
O'Brien:
Sometimes, Winston. Sometimes they are five. Sometimes they are three. Sometimes they are all of them at once. You must try harder. It is not easy to become sane.​

Sure, 1984 is about totalitarianism, but, on a more subtle level still, Orwell's prophetic novel is about ideology in all its forms.
For instance, when applied to the world religion, that of humanism, we can re-read O'Brien:
"it is impossible to see reality the way everyone else sees it unless you believe the central tenets of our creed; the first and foremost of these being:
1. human life is the ultimate explanation for why everything is here
2. human life is sacred, no matter what state of degradation or decrepitude
3. human consciousness is a privileged point of view by means of which we comprehend - in the fullest sense of the term - the cosmos, comprehend and hold sway over, as if by divine right (read: "natural law")."

All three articles of faith are no more than that: questionable, dubious at best, ridiculous and obviously and outlandishly false at worst.

All three are hardly ever questioned by hardly anyone.

Behold, ideology at work, no less insidious, no less pervasive than that depicted in the dystopian vision of 1984.

Thanks for the thought-provoking excerpt, Super Sonic, from one of last century's towering intellects.

DeusAbs
 
DeusAbscondus said:
Sure, 1984 is about totalitarianism, but, on a more subtle level still, Orwell's prophetic novel is about ideology in all its forms.
For instance, when applied to the world religion, that of humanism, we can re-read O'Brien:
"it is impossible to see reality the way everyone else sees it unless you believe the central tenets of our creed; the first and foremost of these being:
1. human life is the ultimate explanation for why everything is here
2. human life is sacred, no matter what state of degradation or decrepitude
3. human consciousness is a privileged point of view by means of which we comprehend - in the fullest sense of the term - the cosmos, comprehend and hold sway over, as if by divine right (read: "natural law")."

All three articles of faith are no more than that: questionable, dubious at best, ridiculous and obviously and outlandishly false at worst.

All three are hardly ever questioned by hardly anyone.

Behold, ideology at work, no less insidious, no less pervasive than that depicted in the dystopian vision of 1984.

Thanks for the thought-provoking excerpt, Super Sonic, from one of last century's towering intellects.

DeusAbs

I never thought about it in that way before so thanks to you for pointing that at (confirmation bias makes it easy for me to believe (Giggle))
 
2 + 2 = 5 for very large values of 2.

-Dan
 

Similar threads

Replies
7
Views
2K
Replies
4
Views
1K
Replies
1
Views
1K
Replies
1
Views
1K
Replies
5
Views
1K
Replies
20
Views
2K
Replies
8
Views
1K
Replies
3
Views
1K
Replies
1
Views
1K
Back
Top