Can a hypernova explosion last for years?

  • Thread starter Thread starter bobie
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Time
bobie
Gold Member
Messages
720
Reaction score
2
How long can the explosion of a super/hyper nova last?,
does time depend on mass?
is it possible that an explosion lasts for years?

Thanks
 
Space news on Phys.org
bobie said:
How long can the explosion of a super/hyper nova last?,
does time depend on mass?
is it possible that an explosion lasts for years?
Thanks

How do you define the end of the explosion? The supernova ejects material into mostly empty space and this material continues expanding for a very long time. For example, this image is of a supernova that exploded in 1006 AD. It is still expanding. So do you consider this explosion to be still occurring? Or is the explosion "over"?
 
phyzguy said:
How do you define the end of the explosion? The supernova ejects material into mostly empty space and this material continues expanding for a very long time. For example, this image is of a supernova that exploded in 1006 AD. It is still expanding. So do you consider this explosion to be still occurring? Or is the explosion "over"?
If I can make a comparison with a volcano, when matter stops being thrown out.
My question is if the esplosion is lake a blast of dynamite, or like a volcano , which can erupt for weeks. Can the star eject material for centuries? does time depend on size, power, speed etc.?
 
bobie said:
If I can make a comparison with a volcano, when matter stops being thrown out.
My question is if the esplosion is lake a blast of dynamite, or like a volcano , which can erupt for weeks. Can the star eject material for centuries? does time depend on size, power, speed etc.?

I see. In that respect, it is more like a blast of dynamite. Most of the energy is deposited in a fraction of a second, and the explosion just evolves from there. The main qualification of this is that many of the heavy nuclei that are ejected are unstable, and they decay over a period of months to years and deposit their energy of decay in the expanding shell.
 
  • Like
Likes 1 person
Thanks a lot
 
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Recombination_(cosmology) Was a matter density right after the decoupling low enough to consider the vacuum as the actual vacuum, and not the medium through which the light propagates with the speed lower than ##({\epsilon_0\mu_0})^{-1/2}##? I'm asking this in context of the calculation of the observable universe radius, where the time integral of the inverse of the scale factor is multiplied by the constant speed of light ##c##.
The formal paper is here. The Rutgers University news has published a story about an image being closely examined at their New Brunswick campus. Here is an excerpt: Computer modeling of the gravitational lens by Keeton and Eid showed that the four visible foreground galaxies causing the gravitational bending couldn’t explain the details of the five-image pattern. Only with the addition of a large, invisible mass, in this case, a dark matter halo, could the model match the observations...
Hi, I’m pretty new to cosmology and I’m trying to get my head around the Big Bang and the potential infinite extent of the universe as a whole. There’s lots of misleading info out there but this forum and a few others have helped me and I just wanted to check I have the right idea. The Big Bang was the creation of space and time. At this instant t=0 space was infinite in size but the scale factor was zero. I’m picturing it (hopefully correctly) like an excel spreadsheet with infinite...
Back
Top