Can a Monkey Rearrange Letters to Spell Illinois and Tennessee?

  • Thread starter Thread starter uiuc2014
  • Start date Start date
uiuc2014
Messages
1
Reaction score
0
I just meet some easy problem like this,
Does a monkey have a better chance of rearranging
or
I I I L L N O S to spell I L L I N O I S
E E E E N N S S T to spell T E N N E S S E E ?

For ILLINOIS
there are 3"I",2"L",1"N",1"O",1"S".
So P(Illinois)= 8!/(3!*2!*1!*1!*1!)
My question is that why the answer of ( 8 )*( 5 )*( 3 )*( 2 )*( 1 )
////////////////////////////////////////////( 3 )//( 2)//( 1 )//( 1 )/( 1 )

is exactly 2 times larger than the former one?


(8)
(3)means selecting 3 out of 8
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
uiuc2014 said:
I just meet some easy problem like this,
Does a monkey have a better chance of rearranging
or
I I I L L N O S to spell I L L I N O I S
E E E E N N S S T to spell T E N N E S S E E ?

For ILLINOIS
there are 3"I",2"L",1"N",1"O",1"S".
So P(Illinois)= 8!/(3!*2!*1!*1!*1!)
My question is that why the answer of ( 8 )*( 5 )*( 3 )*( 2 )*( 1 )
////////////////////////////////////////////( 3 )//( 2)//( 1 )//( 1 )/( 1 )

is exactly 2 times larger than the former one?
What "former one" are you talking about?
\frac{8!}{3! 2!}= \frac{8(7)(6)(5)(4)(3!)}{3! 2!}
and we can cancel the "3!" in numerator and denominator. That leaves
\frac{8(7)(6)(5)(4)}{2}= 3360

If you are saying that the "answer" (to what question) is
\frac{8(5)(3)(2)(1)}{3(2)}= 8(5)= 40
neither is twice the other.


(8)
(3)means selecting 3 out of 8
But what does that have to do with this question?
 
Namaste & G'day Postulate: A strongly-knit team wins on average over a less knit one Fundamentals: - Two teams face off with 4 players each - A polo team consists of players that each have assigned to them a measure of their ability (called a "Handicap" - 10 is highest, -2 lowest) I attempted to measure close-knitness of a team in terms of standard deviation (SD) of handicaps of the players. Failure: It turns out that, more often than, a team with a higher SD wins. In my language, that...
Hi all, I've been a roulette player for more than 10 years (although I took time off here and there) and it's only now that I'm trying to understand the physics of the game. Basically my strategy in roulette is to divide the wheel roughly into two halves (let's call them A and B). My theory is that in roulette there will invariably be variance. In other words, if A comes up 5 times in a row, B will be due to come up soon. However I have been proven wrong many times, and I have seen some...
Back
Top