Can a Physics PhD Land a Quant Job in Finance?

Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion centers on the potential for individuals with a PhD in physics, particularly those with a background in experimental physics and numerical analysis, to secure quant positions in finance without a formal finance degree. Participants explore various pathways, experiences, and advice related to transitioning from physics to finance, including self-study and relevant skills.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Debate/contested
  • Technical explanation

Main Points Raised

  • One participant, Veen, inquires about the feasibility of obtaining a quant job without a finance degree, highlighting their background in numerical analysis and programming.
  • Another participant suggests networking with professionals in the field to gain insights and possibly job shadowing opportunities.
  • A different viewpoint mentions that actuaries have been utilized in quant roles, proposing that strong knowledge in probability and financial math could be beneficial, along with passing actuarial exams as proof of capability.
  • Some participants note that historically, technical PhDs without finance backgrounds were commonly hired as quants, and Veen's skills in programming and numerical methods could make them a strong candidate with self-study in mathematical finance.
  • It is mentioned that entry-level quants often do not have formal financial backgrounds, but a self-taught understanding is expected, with emphasis on the importance of applying for jobs during the final year of a PhD.
  • Contrarily, one participant argues that the landscape has changed, suggesting that employers now expect candidates to have knowledge of specific financial texts, such as those by John Hull.
  • A suggestion is made to seek further discussion on other forums like Wilmott or QuantNet for additional perspectives.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express a mix of opinions regarding the current expectations for quant candidates without finance degrees. While some believe it is still possible to enter the field, others contend that the requirements have become more stringent, indicating a lack of consensus on the matter.

Contextual Notes

There are varying assumptions about the current job market for quants, including the relevance of self-study and the necessity of formal qualifications. The discussion reflects differing perspectives on the evolving expectations of employers in the finance sector.

googleveena
Messages
5
Reaction score
0
Hi
I am doing my phd in physics. I am working on experimental physics. My work involves some numerical analysis using Matlab, and finite element analysis also. I know c/c++ pretty well. I am planning to get knowledge on finance by self study and look for finance jobs after graduation. is it possible to get a quant job without finance degree?
any discussion is appreciated.

thanks
Veen
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Your best bet would be to contact the people in the profession. Ask if they'd be willing to meet with you for lunch or let you job shadow them for a day. My guess (which isn't worth much) is that it is possible - although the more experience you have with financial models the better.
 
This might be a stretch. And, I don't know much about it. But actuaries have been used in a quant capacity. If you are rock solid in probability and financial math you might take a shot at the first couple of actuarial exams. It would be proof to employers that you are capable. Not that your qualifications are not good enough already. But the exams may build a bridge for you.
 
I think, before the proliferation of professional masters programs in mathematical finance / financial engineering, it was fairly common to hire technical PhDs (in math, physics, engineering, etc.) with no background in finance as quants. Even with that said, it sounds like your background is a pretty good match (programming experience in C++, and it sounds like you have experience in numerical methods for solving PDEs), so with some self study of mathematical finance (from standard books like Hull) and of probability and random processes, I think you could present yourself as an extremely qualified candidate for some quant positions.
 
It's relatively normal for entry level quants to not have a formal financial background. Although you'll be expected to have a decent self-taught understanding. Assuming to fit all their other requirements (personality, etc) I see no reason you wouldn't be a suitable quant candidate. It'll still ultimately be down to perseverance and luck though, like any job.

From what I've seen, they like to grab you before the end of the PhD though (it's easier to get a job offer whilst you're in the last year of your PhD than afterwards). Round these parts, I've seen them try to get people to give up the PhD and join them straight away, but I've never heard of anyone's quant-type job offer being withdrawn because they said they couldn't start for a few months. And you rise through the ranks quicker with one too.

The key take home point: You need to apply for the jobs now.
 
Ex1 said:
It's relatively normal for entry level quants to not have a formal financial background.

This is not true anymore. Since so many ppl trying to get into the field, they expects knowledge from john hull
 
Hi George,
Hoping you'll say hello (I sent you a private message).
Dave Kosokowsky
 
Ask this question on the wilmott or quantnet forums
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 36 ·
2
Replies
36
Views
5K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
Replies
37
Views
7K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
1K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 50 ·
2
Replies
50
Views
11K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K