Can a Primitive Root of p Also Be a Primitive Root of p^2?

Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the conditions under which a primitive root of an odd prime \( p \) can also be a primitive root of \( p^2 \). Participants explore the implications of certain congruences and the order of elements in modular arithmetic.

Discussion Character

  • Technical explanation
  • Mathematical reasoning
  • Debate/contested

Main Points Raised

  • One participant states that if \( x \) is a primitive root of \( p \) and \( x^{p-1} \) is not congruent to 1 mod \( p^2 \), then \( x \) is a primitive root of \( p^2 \).
  • Another participant elaborates on the proof, using Fermat's Little Theorem to establish that \( x^{p-1} \equiv 1 \pmod{p} \) and derives that \( x^{p-1} = pk + 1 \) with \( p \nmid k \).
  • The order of \( x \) mod \( p^2 \) is denoted as \( n \), leading to the conclusion that \( (p-1) \mid n \) and \( n = l(p-1) \) for some integer \( l \).
  • It is noted that \( x^n \equiv 1 \pmod{p^2} \) leads to \( lpk + 1 \equiv 1 \pmod{p^2} \), prompting a question about the logic behind this step.
  • Another participant points out that the result is vacuously true when \( p = 2 \) and seeks clarification on the reasoning used in the proof.
  • A participant responds by introducing the Binomial expansion, stating that \( (1 + pk)^l = 1 + pkl + p^2t \) for some integer \( t \), suggesting this clarifies the previous logic.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express uncertainty regarding specific steps in the proof, particularly the logic behind certain congruences. There is no consensus on the clarity of the argument presented, and the discussion remains unresolved in terms of the proof's completeness.

Contextual Notes

The discussion assumes \( p \) is an odd prime and does not address the case when \( p = 2 \) in detail, which may affect the generality of the conclusions drawn.

Poirot1
Messages
243
Reaction score
0
Show that if $x$ is a primitive root of p, and $x^{p-1}$ is not congruent to 1 mod$p^2$, then x is a primitive root of $p^2$
 
Last edited:
Mathematics news on Phys.org
Re: primitive root challenge

Poirot said:
Show that if $x$ is a primitive root of p, and $x^{p-1}$ is not congruent to 1 mod$p^2$, then x is a primitive root of $p^2$

We assume $p$ is an odd prime.

By Fermat, $x^{p-1}\equiv 1\pmod{p}$.
Thus $x^{p-1}=pk+1$. By hypothesis, $p\not |k$.
Let order of $x$ mod $p^2$ be $n$. Then $x^n\equiv 1\pmod{p}$, therefore $(p-1)|n$ (since order of $x$ mod $p$ is $p-1$).
Write $n=l(p-1)$.
So we have $x^n=(pk+1)^{l}\equiv 1\pmod{p^2}$.
So we have $lpk+1\equiv 1\pmod{p^2}$.
Thus $p|(lk)$.
Since $p$ doesn't divide $k$, we have $p|l$ and now its easy to show that $n=p(p-1)=\varphi(p^2)$ and we are done.
 
Re: primitive root challenge

caffeinemachine said:
So we have $x^n=(pk+1)^{l}\equiv 1\pmod{p^2}$.

So we have $lpk+1\equiv 1\pmod{p^2}$.

What is the logic in this step?
Also, note the result is vacuously true when p=2.
 
Re: primitive root challenge

Poirot said:
What is the logic in this step?
Also, note the result is vacuously true when p=2.
Hello Poirot,

By Binomial expansion we have $(1+pk)^l=1+pkl+p^2t$ for some integer $t$.
Now it should be clear I believe.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
4K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
1K
  • · Replies 24 ·
Replies
24
Views
1K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
1K