Poirot1
- 243
- 0
Show that if $x$ is a primitive root of p, and $x^{p-1}$ is not congruent to 1 mod$p^2$, then x is a primitive root of $p^2$
Last edited:
The discussion establishes that if \( x \) is a primitive root of an odd prime \( p \) and \( x^{p-1} \) is not congruent to 1 modulo \( p^2 \), then \( x \) is also a primitive root of \( p^2 \). It utilizes Fermat's Little Theorem and properties of orders in modular arithmetic to derive that the order of \( x \) modulo \( p^2 \) is \( n = p(p-1) \), confirming that \( x \) meets the criteria for being a primitive root of \( p^2 \). The discussion also notes that the result is vacuously true for \( p = 2 \).
PREREQUISITESMathematicians, number theorists, and students studying modular arithmetic and primitive roots, particularly those interested in advanced properties of primes and their powers.
Poirot said:Show that if $x$ is a primitive root of p, and $x^{p-1}$ is not congruent to 1 mod$p^2$, then x is a primitive root of $p^2$
caffeinemachine said:So we have $x^n=(pk+1)^{l}\equiv 1\pmod{p^2}$.
So we have $lpk+1\equiv 1\pmod{p^2}$.
Hello Poirot,Poirot said:What is the logic in this step?
Also, note the result is vacuously true when p=2.