Can a rider change the combined center of gravity of a motorcycle by leaning?

AI Thread Summary
A rider cannot change the combined center of gravity of a motorcycle in a closed system by shifting their weight, as any movement to one side is countered by an equal movement in the opposite direction. However, in an open system with tires on the road, the rider can influence the motorcycle's lean by using their body's inertia, which can effectively alter the combined center of gravity. This interaction is similar to a swing set, where leaning initiates movement through tension in the supporting chains. The motorcycle's angular inertia and gyroscopic effects resist changes in lean angle, while the forces applied to the pavement create a dynamic response. Ultimately, the steering mechanism plays a crucial role, as the front tire's contact point is positioned behind the pivot axis, leading to counter steering when the rider leans.
Erunanethiell
Messages
2
Reaction score
0
In a closed system, I know the rider wouldn't be able to change the combined center of gravity of the system by moving his weight around. If he pushes the bike to lean to the right, he would go to the left by the amount that would keep the combined cog the same.

But a bike with tires and a road under it is not a closed system, the tires wouldn't let the lower part of the bike left or right when tryingo to initiate lean. Does this mean it is possible to push with your bodies inertia to the bike, and the combined cog will be changed? I thing if you do so above the cog of the bike, you could, but I am not sure.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
It is a bit like a swing set where you can start swinging without touching the ground - just as inverted pendulum, with the support below the bike instead of above the swing.
 
  • Like
Likes Erunanethiell
Why does it work if it wouldn't work in a closed system? Is it because tires stop the lower part of the bike move laterally?
 
Right. Friction (and the non-zero contact width) can lead to a net force and torque on the system.
 
  • Like
Likes Erunanethiell
mfb said:
It is a bit like a swing set where you can start swinging without touching the ground - just as inverted pendulum, with the support below the bike instead of above the swing.
In the case of a swing, the supporting chains or ropes are displaced forwards or backwards by the person leaning forwards or backwards, pushing forward or pulling backwards on the supporting chains or ropes, resulting in a backwards or forwards component of tension in the supporting chains or ropes, and this initiates movement.

Erunanethiell said:
In a closed system, I know the rider wouldn't be able to change the combined center of gravity of the system by moving his weight around. If he pushes the bike to lean to the right, he would go to the left by the amount that would keep the combined cog the same.

But a bike with tires and a road under it is not a closed system, the tires wouldn't let the lower part of the bike left or right when trying to initiate lean. Does this mean it is possible to push with your bodies inertia to the bike, and the combined cog will be changed? I thing if you do so above the cog of the bike, you could, but I am not sure.
The bikes effective angular inertia, which is affected by the gyroscopic reactions in the wheels, resists a change in lean angle due to the rider leaning to one side or the other. The result is some of that force is applied to the pavement, coexistent with the pavement applying a force onto the bike in the same direction as the rider leans.

The dominant effect is related to steering. On a typical bike, the point of contact of the front tire is "behind" the pivot axis, so if the rider leans to the left, the front tier initially steers to the right, an indirect form of counter steering.
 
The rope is tied into the person (the load of 200 pounds) and the rope goes up from the person to a fixed pulley and back down to his hands. He hauls the rope to suspend himself in the air. What is the mechanical advantage of the system? The person will indeed only have to lift half of his body weight (roughly 100 pounds) because he now lessened the load by that same amount. This APPEARS to be a 2:1 because he can hold himself with half the force, but my question is: is that mechanical...
Some physics textbook writer told me that Newton's first law applies only on bodies that feel no interactions at all. He said that if a body is on rest or moves in constant velocity, there is no external force acting on it. But I have heard another form of the law that says the net force acting on a body must be zero. This means there is interactions involved after all. So which one is correct?
Thread 'Beam on an inclined plane'
Hello! I have a question regarding a beam on an inclined plane. I was considering a beam resting on two supports attached to an inclined plane. I was almost sure that the lower support must be more loaded. My imagination about this problem is shown in the picture below. Here is how I wrote the condition of equilibrium forces: $$ \begin{cases} F_{g\parallel}=F_{t1}+F_{t2}, \\ F_{g\perp}=F_{r1}+F_{r2} \end{cases}. $$ On the other hand...
Back
Top