A Can a Scalar Field Exist Without a Net Source?

AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on the concept of sources and sinks in fields, specifically questioning whether a scalar field can exist without a net source, defined as having zero divergence. It is established that a magnetic field has equal sources and sinks, leading to no net source. The inquiry seeks clarification on the definition of divergence in relation to scalar functions. Participants explore the implications of having non-zero divergence for scalar fields. The conversation emphasizes the need for a clear understanding of divergence in this context.
Shubham135
Messages
18
Reaction score
0
The magnetic field has no net source or sinks i.e. number of sources are equal to the number of sinks. Can a scalar field also have no net source? Or a source is required for a scalar field?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
In this context a "source" is a non zero divergence. Do you have a definition for the divergence of a scalar function?
 
Dale said:
In this context a "source" is a non zero divergence. Do you have a definition for the divergence of a scalar function?
This is precisely my question
 
Thread 'Question about pressure of a liquid'

Thread 'Question about pressure of a liquid'

I am looking at pressure in liquids and I am testing my idea. The vertical tube is 100m, the contraption is filled with water. The vertical tube is very thin(maybe 1mm^2 cross section). The area of the base is ~100m^2. Will he top half be launched in the air if suddenly it cracked?- assuming its light enough. I want to test my idea that if I had a thin long ruber tube that I lifted up, then the pressure at "red lines" will be high and that the $force = pressure * area$ would be massive...
View full post »

Thread 'Why is the 3 body problem unsolvable? And what will happen if someone solves it?'

I feel it should be solvable we just need to find a perfect pattern, and there will be a general pattern since the forces acting are based on a single function, so..... you can't actually say it is unsolvable right? Cause imaging 3 bodies actually existed somwhere in this universe then nature isn't gonna wait till we predict it! And yea I have checked in many places that tiny changes cause large changes so it becomes chaos........ but still I just can't accept that it is impossible to solve...
View full post »

Similar threads

B A Magnetic Misconception on Divergence 0/Closed Field Lines?
Replies
3
Views
1K
B Can charges move without a field? How charges redistribute without it?
Replies
16
Views
1K
I Is this analogy between Magnetic Force and Gravitational Force accurate in helping to understand what contributes more to a stronger magnetic force?
Replies
11
Views
2K
I Relationship between nuclear magnetic physics and Maxwell's demon
Replies
1
Views
133
B Conceptually understanding change in potential energy with 0 net work
Replies
9
Views
2K
Can Electromagnetic Fields Generate Net Thrust with a Metal Plate?
Replies
5
Views
3K
I Can angular motion exist outside of a gravity field?
Replies
10
Views
2K
I Intuition behind fields in Transmission lines
Replies
2
Views
1K
B Permanent magnets and energy question
Replies
16
Views
2K
I Hall effect -- is it always applicable?
Replies
7
Views
2K

Hot Threads

Recent Insights

Back
Top