Can a Skydiver Survive a Free Fall Without a Parachute?

Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around a physics problem concerning the survivability of a skydiver who experiences a parachute failure and impacts the ground at terminal velocity. The subject area includes concepts of kinematics and dynamics, particularly focusing on acceleration, velocity, and distance calculations under extreme conditions.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Assumption checking, Mathematical reasoning

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • The original poster attempts to use kinematic equations to determine the minimum distance required for a skydiver to come to rest after free fall. They express uncertainty regarding their calculations and the assumptions made about acceleration.

Discussion Status

Some participants provide guidance on the use of initial and final velocities along with maximum acceleration to calculate the distance. There is an exploration of whether the calculated distance represents a minimum requirement, with some participants affirming this interpretation.

Contextual Notes

The problem is constrained by the lack of specific height or time information, which may affect the calculations and assumptions made by the participants.

Xman1120
Messages
2
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


For a brief moment, the human body can withstand accelerations of up to 75g. If a sky diver is unlucky enough to have a parachute fail, and hits the ground with a terminal velocity of 50 m/s, what is the minimum distance over which he can come to a rest (assuming constant acceleration) and survive. This occasionally happens if one is fortunate enough to land in thick brush, deep snow and/or on a steep hill.

Homework Equations


\Deltax = Vi + 1/2 * a *t^2
Vf^2-Vi^2 = 2*a* \Delta x

The Attempt at a Solution


Without having a height or a time, my assumption would be to use Vf^2-Vi^2 = 2*a* \Delta x , but when doing this I assume the acceleration would be 9.8 m/s^2 , the terminal velocity being Vf which is 50 m/s, however when i calculate and solve for x i get 127.55 m, yet I don't believe that's the minimum. where am I going wrong?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
You have the initial velocity (50 m/s), final velocity (0 m/s), and acceleration (75g). From this information you should be able to determine distance.
 
Then I'm assuming that after my calculations, that would be the minimum distance?
 
Yes. If the max acceleration the human body can stand is 75g, the distance associated with a body slowing down to rest would be the minimum distance. Greater distances would imply lower acceleration.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 34 ·
2
Replies
34
Views
4K
Replies
28
Views
3K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
3K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
11
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
5K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
1K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
3K