Can a spherical spinning projectile oscillate in flight?

AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on whether a spherical spinning projectile, like a BB pellet, can oscillate in flight due to imbalances. One viewpoint asserts that an unbalanced BB will wobble on the x and y axes because its geometric center differs from its center of mass. The opposing view claims that all spinning objects rotate around their center of mass and follow a linear parabolic path, making wobbling impossible. However, turbulence and aerodynamic forces can complicate this, potentially causing oscillations and affecting the projectile's trajectory. Ultimately, the debate highlights the complexities of projectile dynamics in air, emphasizing that balanced BBs may perform better.
r2d222
Messages
2
Reaction score
0
There is a very heated debate in a forum for airsoft that I frequent. It is about what happens to ba bb pellet when it is fired from a bb gun. Two point of contention have formed.

1. A unbalanced bb, who's geometric center is disparate from it's center of mass will wobble, or oscillate on the y and x-axis due to it's imbalance.

2. The opposing view is that all spinning objects spin around it's center of mass and travel a linear parabolic path and thus it is impossible to wobble.

So which is true?

Here is a link to the thread of that discussion.

http://forums.airsoftmechanics.com/index.php/topic,8507.0.html

Thanks for your responses!
 
Science news on Phys.org
If the BB is unbalanced, it should spin about it's center of mass. However due to turbulence, which could be further aggravated by a unbalanced spinnnig bb, there will be some "wobble". If there is a component of deflection of the air perpendicular to the path of the bb, then the center of mass of the bb will be accelerated a small amount in the opposite direction (also perpendicular to the path of the bb).
 
What happens in the gun barrel? Are they rifled to make the BB spin? If so then presumably it will try to spin about the center of mass but it will be constrained by the barrel. My guess is the mass of the gun forces it to spin about the center of the barrel rather than the center of mass but that might not be true. Then when it leaves it will spin about it's center of mass as others have said. I wonder what happens in the transition? Either way it sounds like balanced BB are better.
 
r2d222 said:
1. A unbalanced bb, who's geometric center is disparate from it's center of mass will wobble, or oscillate on the y and x-axis due to it's imbalance.
What exactly will oscillate? The geometric or the mass center?

r2d222 said:
2. The opposing view is that all spinning objects spin around it's center of mass and travel a linear parabolic path and thus it is impossible to wobble.
What exactly does "wobble" mean? If the objects geometric and mass center are different, then even if the mass center moves parabolically, the geometric center can oscillate, causing a visual wobble effect.

The assumption that the mass center must move parabolically is true for vacuum. Aerodynamics makes it more complicated, as rcgldr pointed out. An off-mass-center aerodynamic force will cause a torque that tries to change the axis of rotation. The gyroscopic effect causes precession of the rotation axis, allowing a cyclic acceleration of the mass center perpendicular to the flight path by the Magnus effect. And turbulence makes it even more complicated, because under certain conditions it can resonate and create aerodynamic flutter.
 
What is tracked in a spinning projectile? It's center of mass or it's geometric center?
In a hypothetical vacum, given two objects with the same mass and velocity, will imbalanced object distance traveled be less than the balanced one? If the geo center was tracked it would be obvious that the unbalanced object will travel less because of the wobble but it wouldn't matter if center mass was tracked.

The argument was the would be movement decay in the horizontal axis caused by vertical oscillations of the geo center not necessarily caused by turbulence.

Thanks!
 
Thread 'A quartet of epi-illumination methods'
Well, it took almost 20 years (!!!), but I finally obtained a set of epi-phase microscope objectives (Zeiss). The principles of epi-phase contrast is nearly identical to transillumination phase contrast, but the phase ring is a 1/8 wave retarder rather than a 1/4 wave retarder (because with epi-illumination, the light passes through the ring twice). This method was popular only for a very short period of time before epi-DIC (differential interference contrast) became widely available. So...
I am currently undertaking a research internship where I am modelling the heating of silicon wafers with a 515 nm femtosecond laser. In order to increase the absorption of the laser into the oxide layer on top of the wafer it was suggested we use gold nanoparticles. I was tasked with modelling the optical properties of a 5nm gold nanoparticle, in particular the absorption cross section, using COMSOL Multiphysics. My model seems to be getting correct values for the absorption coefficient and...

Similar threads

Back
Top