Can a Three-State Logic System Revolutionize Computing?

  • Thread starter Thread starter ocalhoun
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Logic
ocalhoun
Messages
8
Reaction score
0
Normal boolean logic works with two states; true and false, which works fine with today's computer systems, which work with 1's and 0's.

However, I'm working on a new type of computer (Just need to figure out one last part about the 'and' gate), which will have three states (--,|,+).
I'm thinking this would be horizontal, vertical, and both.

What I'm wondering, is how this effects the logic of it. (true, false, or both?)
What would this system of logic look like, and what different or new types of logic gates would be required?

It wouldn't be too difficult, except for the fact that I can't seem to make sense of something being both true and false.

As an example, here's an IO chart for a 'not' gate:
In Out
--..|
|...--
+...+
And an 'or' gate:
InA InB Out
.--..--...--
.--...|...|
.--...+...|
..|...|...|
..|...+...|
..+...+...|

I'm thinking that I'll have to use more than the normal three basic gates (which all the others are made of), but what will the others be like?


If this should be in the computers section instead, forgive me, but I don't think so, as this project hasn't produced anything I'd call a 'computer' yet.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Try Google with "tri-valued logic" or "triple-valued logic". You should get a lot of hits.
 
Namaste & G'day Postulate: A strongly-knit team wins on average over a less knit one Fundamentals: - Two teams face off with 4 players each - A polo team consists of players that each have assigned to them a measure of their ability (called a "Handicap" - 10 is highest, -2 lowest) I attempted to measure close-knitness of a team in terms of standard deviation (SD) of handicaps of the players. Failure: It turns out that, more often than, a team with a higher SD wins. In my language, that...
Hi all, I've been a roulette player for more than 10 years (although I took time off here and there) and it's only now that I'm trying to understand the physics of the game. Basically my strategy in roulette is to divide the wheel roughly into two halves (let's call them A and B). My theory is that in roulette there will invariably be variance. In other words, if A comes up 5 times in a row, B will be due to come up soon. However I have been proven wrong many times, and I have seen some...
Back
Top