Can ALL Vector Fields Be Expressed as a Product?

Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around whether all vector fields can be expressed as the product of a scalar field and a constant vector. Participants explore the implications of this concept in relation to vector fields and Stokes' theorem.

Discussion Character

  • Debate/contested

Main Points Raised

  • One participant questions if all vector fields can be expressed as \(\vec{A} = \varphi \vec{c}\) for any vector field \(\vec{A}\).
  • Another participant asks for clarification on the definition of a vector field being used in the discussion.
  • A different participant provides an example of a vector field in a coordinate system, suggesting that each component is a function of the coordinates.
  • One participant asserts that the answer to the original question is no, stating that vector fields can have many different vectors that are not scalar multiples of each other.
  • Another participant elaborates that the described vector field would consist of parallel vectors, indicating that not all vector fields can be represented in this manner.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants generally disagree on the original question, with some asserting that not all vector fields can be expressed as the product of a scalar field and a constant vector, while others seek clarification on definitions and examples.

Contextual Notes

There is an implicit assumption regarding the nature of vector fields and their representation, which may vary based on definitions used by participants. The discussion does not resolve these assumptions.

yoghurt54
Messages
18
Reaction score
0
Hey - I'm stuck on a concept:

Are ALL vector fields expressable as the product of a scalar field [tex]\varphi[/tex] and a constant vector [tex]\vec{c}[/tex]?

i.e. Is there always a [tex]\varphi[/tex] such that

[tex]\vec{A}[/tex] = [tex]\varphi[/tex] [tex]\vec{c}[/tex] ?

for ANY field [tex]\vec{A}[/tex]?

I ask because there are some derivations from Stokes' theorem that follow from this idea, and I'm not sure these rules apply to all vector fields, because surely there are some vector fields that can't be expressed as such a product.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
What is the definition of vector field that you are using?
 
I'm not sure exactly what you mean, but my understanding of a vector field in this context is that it's a field in a coordinate system where each component is a function of the coordinates of that point, e.g.
[tex]\vec{A}(x,y,z) = (x^2 - y^2, xz, y^3 + xz^2)[/tex]
 
Last edited:
The answer to your original question is obviously no. Vector fields would have many different vectors which are not scalar multiples of each other.
 
The vector field as you've described it would consist of a field of parallel vectors, each perhaps having a different length, as constituted by your scalar field phi. Clearly not all vector fields are of this type (ie. parallel).
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 20 ·
Replies
20
Views
4K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
3K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
1K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
4K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
13K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K