Can an Immortal Snail Ever Reach the End of a Stretching Rubber Band?

  • Thread starter Thread starter Office_Shredder
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Challenge
Office_Shredder
Staff Emeritus
Science Advisor
Gold Member
Messages
5,702
Reaction score
1,587
Similar to the previous two-part question, if you find part b to be an appropriate challenge please leave part a to those who are appropriately challenged by it.

This question is courtesy of mfb

An immortal snail is at one end of a perfect rubber band with a length of 1km. Every day, it travels 10cm towards the other side. Every night, the rubber band gets stretched uniformly by 1km. As an example, during the first day the snail will advance to x=10cm, then the rubber band gets stretched by a factor of 2, so the snail is now at x=20cm on a rubber band of 2km.

Will the snail ever arrive at the other side, and if yes, how long does it take approximately?
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
Hi everyone!
First crack at a math challenge. Not sure if I'm on the right track. Sadly all my relevant math notes and Ti-89 (which might as well be a third arm for me) is on the other side of the country.

But hoping someone can tell me if I'm barking up the right tree or if want I want to do isn't possible.

Calculating by hand I find the position of the snail to be:
(end of) Day 1 =0.0002
Day 2 = 0.00045
Day 3 = 0.000733
Day 4 = 0.001042 etc etc etc

This leads me to beliving the formula for the position of the snail is
<br /> x[n]=0.0002 \,\,n=1<br />

<br /> x[n] = {\frac{(n+1)}{n}}*(x[n-1]+0.0001) \,\, n &gt; 1<br />

expanding this I get something like
<br /> x[n] = x[n-1] + 0.0001 + {\frac{1}{n}}*(x[n-1] + 0.0001)<br /> <br />

from here do the Z transform,
solve for x[z] and inverse it and you'll have a formula for the snails position. Subract n and figure out where the function goes positive??

I realize there is a bit of hand waving here :)

Specifically where I'm stuck is figuring out the z transform of

<br /> {\frac{1}{n}}*(x[n-1] + 0.0001)<br />
 
This challenge might be too easy for me, but here's my solution anyway...

After the first day, the fraction of rubber band's length traveled is ##\frac{0.1m}{1000m}=\frac{1}{10000}##. Stretching the rubber band does not change this fraction. On the second day, the snail travels a fraction of ##\frac{0.1m}{2000m}=\frac{1}{20000}## along the rubber band. Therefore, after ##n## days, the fraction is ##\frac{1}{10000}\sum_{k=1}^{n}\frac{1}{k}##. As the harmonic series ##\sum_{k=1}^{\infty}\frac{1}{k}## does not converge, the snail will eventually get to the other end of the rubber band. The number of days needed for this can be solved from the equation

##\frac{1}{10000}\sum_{k=1}^{n}\frac{1}{k}=1##.

To solve this, we make the approximation ##\sum_{k=1}^{n}\frac{1}{k}\approx \ln n + \gamma##, where ##\gamma## is the Euler-Mascheroni constant. With this approximation, we get the result

##n \approx e^{10000-\gamma}##,

which is a very large number, about ##4.945 \times 10^{4342}##.
 
@hilbert2: that is correct.
 
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...
Fermat's Last Theorem has long been one of the most famous mathematical problems, and is now one of the most famous theorems. It simply states that the equation $$ a^n+b^n=c^n $$ has no solutions with positive integers if ##n>2.## It was named after Pierre de Fermat (1607-1665). The problem itself stems from the book Arithmetica by Diophantus of Alexandria. It gained popularity because Fermat noted in his copy "Cubum autem in duos cubos, aut quadratoquadratum in duos quadratoquadratos, et...
I'm interested to know whether the equation $$1 = 2 - \frac{1}{2 - \frac{1}{2 - \cdots}}$$ is true or not. It can be shown easily that if the continued fraction converges, it cannot converge to anything else than 1. It seems that if the continued fraction converges, the convergence is very slow. The apparent slowness of the convergence makes it difficult to estimate the presence of true convergence numerically. At the moment I don't know whether this converges or not.
Back
Top