Can an object be halfway between focal point and diverging mirror?

  • Context: Undergrad 
  • Thread starter Thread starter Negatratoron
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Focal Mirror Point
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on the physics problem from "Principles of Physics" by Mazur regarding the placement of an object in relation to a diverging mirror. It concludes that placing an object halfway between the focal point and the diverging mirror is not feasible, as the focal point of a diverging mirror is located behind the mirror. The participant references Table 33.2, which indicates that the scenario of an object being behind the mirror occurs only with specific combinations of lenses or mirrors.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of diverging mirrors and their focal points
  • Familiarity with optics terminology, including image distance and object placement
  • Knowledge of the principles of image formation in mirrors
  • Ability to interpret physics problems from "Principles of Physics" by Mazur
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the properties of diverging mirrors in optics
  • Review the concepts of image distance and object distance in mirror equations
  • Explore lens and mirror combinations in optics
  • Analyze problems involving object placement relative to focal points in various optical systems
USEFUL FOR

Students studying optics, physics educators, and anyone interested in understanding the behavior of light in relation to diverging mirrors.

Negatratoron
Messages
25
Reaction score
7
A physics question from Principles of Physics by Mazur in the chapter on Optics is asking me to "repeat Problem 92 for a diverging mirror", and one of the questions in Problem 92 (which is about a converging mirror) is to find the image distance of an object halfway between the focal point and the mirror.

I do not believe this is possible, since the focal point of a diverging mirror is behind the mirror, and so an object halfway between the focal point and the mirror is also behind the mirror.
 
Science news on Phys.org
I think I figured it out. Table 33.2 in the text has a footnote in the "o < 0" case: "Encountered only with lens or mirror combinations". If any mirror is in combination with other mirrors and lenses, it may be the case that the object is behind the mirror.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
3K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
2K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
4K
  • · Replies 17 ·
Replies
17
Views
4K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
11K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K