PseudoIntellect said:
I thought that the idea of a white hole or wormhole was mostly ad hoc,
I agree with the general sense of what you say----they are speculative ideas based on applying classical General Relativity where it may, in fact, not be applicable. Dubious, if not precisely ad hoc.
...should probably go further to unite general relativity and quantum mechnanics before speculating and what happens when matter enters a black hole, yes? Or do I not know what I am talking about?
Further than what? is the question. Certainly you sound like you know something about this, and any advances in understanding what happens down hole is going to depend on making progress in quantum gravity----quantizing General Relativity.
So I agree basically, but at the same time i see progress being made at quantizing GR and some interesting quantum black hole bounce, and big bang bounce models, being developed. The unresolved issue now is whether and how these models fit together, so that (if they fit) one could lead to the other.
In other words can a black hole collapse lead to a big bang creating a separate expanding spacetime region?
If anyone wants links to recent technical papers about quantum bang and hole models (Ashtekar et al, Gambini et al, and others) just ask.
It is good to be cautious, but not so cautious that you ignore signficiant advances.
If you want to know who the currently most highly cited researchers are in quantum gravity as applied to cosmology, there's a thread about it. I got stats on recognized leading people and some others. these would be the people who are currently addressing these problems of what happens down a black hole, what happened before the big bang.
Here is that thread "Who the top quantum cosmology researchers are."
https://www.physicsforums.com/showthread.php?t=175240
It gets updated, so the last post on the thread is the one to look at. I just updated it today:
marcus said:
Here are the citation totals as of 28 December 2007. Only papers published since 2002 which have received 35+ cites are tallied.
Bojowald 737
Singh 477
Ashtekar 409
Steinhardt 351
Reuter 86
Hawking 71
Veneziano 39
Source:
http://www.slac.stanford.edu/spires/