Can Calculating a Horse's Leg Spring Constant Predict Jump Heights?

Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the feasibility of calculating a horse's leg spring constant to predict jump heights. Participants explore the relationship between the energy stored in a horse's leg tendons, modeled as a spring, and the potential energy associated with jumping. The conversation includes theoretical considerations, mathematical modeling, and practical implications for a science fair project.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Technical explanation
  • Debate/contested
  • Mathematical reasoning

Main Points Raised

  • One participant suggests using the equation PE=1/2kx² to find the potential energy stored in the horse's leg, questioning if this approach is valid.
  • Another participant emphasizes the need to clarify the mass of the horse and the height it needs to jump to calculate the minimum energy required using PE=mgh.
  • There is a discussion about the correct formulation of the spring constant, with some arguing it should be k=F/x, while others express confusion about the relationship between force, displacement, and jump height.
  • One participant proposes that the displacement measured when the horse's leg is under weight could be used to determine the spring constant, suggesting that varying displacements during jumps could help calculate potential energy.
  • Concerns are raised about the implications of using a constant force (the horse's weight) in the calculations, questioning whether it accurately reflects the dynamics of jumping.
  • Participants express uncertainty about the ultimate goal of the calculations, whether it is to determine the spring constant or the jump height, and how these variables interact.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants do not reach a consensus on the correct approach to calculating the spring constant or its implications for predicting jump heights. Multiple competing views and uncertainties remain regarding the relationships between force, displacement, and energy in the context of the horse's jumping mechanics.

Contextual Notes

Limitations include potential misunderstandings about the definitions of variables, the need for consistent units, and the assumptions underlying the modeling of the horse's leg as a spring. The discussion also highlights unresolved mathematical steps and the complexity of relating spring dynamics to jumping performance.

Liz Hoyt
Messages
3
Reaction score
0
Science fair help needed! Horses use the energy stored in their tendons to help propel them over a jump- much like a spring. By determining the spring constant for the leg, the student wants to then calculate the potential energy stored in that leg. Would this work? From her research proposal:
I will use the equation, PE=1/2kx² to find the potential energy the leg stores (where k=spring constant, x=spring displacement). X will be found by measuring the smallest distance between the two measuring points when the horse has both feet on the ground and subtracting from equilibrium. k can be solved for by using the equation; k= (x-x₁)/F. x being the displaced length, x₁ being leg at equilibrium and F equaling force. The values I will be using for that equation will be x equaling leg being stood on, x₁ relaxed leg, F being force on standing leg. To find force I will take the Weight of horse in kg then to find force on one leg, multiply by .55 (for forelimbs) or .45 (hindlimbs) then divide by two.
Does this make sense? The difference (x) between a leg at rest and under weight is 0.025m, Force is 1225N so spring constant is 0.00002041? This makes for a very small value for PE too?
I should include that I a biology teacher that is taking students to a state science fair. My background in physics is limited and the student is asking for help so I am seeking help on her behalf. Thank you!
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
I'm not exactly sure what you did here. You were dealing with the potential energy of the spring, and then changed to the Hooke's law force.

If you are making a model of this via a simple spring problem, then I think there might be a few mistakes here. Here's what you need:

1. Get a value for the mass of a horse (in kg).
2. Figure out how high the horse needs to jump (in meters).
3. From 1 and 2, using PE = mgh, this is the minimum energy that you need to store in your spring (in Joules).
4. You know how much the horse's leg bends (your "displaced" length), (in meters).
5. Then, using the PE equation that you wrote, you have everything to calculate the spring constant.

You should never lose sight that these have units (something I often tell my students ad nauseum), even the spring constant. It is difficult to diagnose what went wrong with your description because you never included any units. We can't tell if you used the right ones, or if you mixed-and-matched different ones.

Zz.
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: Liz Hoyt
ZapperZ said:
I'm not exactly sure what you did here. You were dealing with the potential energy of the spring, and then changed to the Hooke's law force.

If you are making a model of this via a simple spring problem, then I think there might be a few mistakes here. Here's what you need:

1. Get a value for the mass of a horse (in kg).
2. Figure out how high the horse needs to jump (in meters).
3. From 1 and 2, using PE = mgh, this is the minimum energy that you need to store in your spring (in Joules).
4. You know how much the horse's leg bends (your "displaced" length), (in meters).
5. Then, using the PE equation that you wrote, you have everything to calculate the spring constant.

You should never lose sight that these have units (something I often tell my students ad nauseum), even the spring constant. It is difficult to diagnose what went wrong with your description because you never included any units. We can't tell if you used the right ones, or if you mixed-and-matched different ones.

Zz.
She was hoping to determine the spring constant in the leg and then use that to determine the potential energy in that leg. I think that she has her formula for k incorrect though. It should be k=F/x with x being the displacement.
 
Liz Hoyt said:
She was hoping to determine the spring constant in the leg and then use that to determine the potential energy in that leg. I think that she has her formula for k incorrect though. It should be k=F/x with x being the displacement.

But think about it. Your "F" is nothing more than the weight of the horse. It ends up being a constant, no matter how high the horse has to jump, because your "equation" doesn't take this into account. The "x" is the displacement of the "spring", i.e. the horse's leg/muscles since you are modeling it as a spring. This is not the height it has to jump. So, does the fact that your F remains constant, no matter how high the horse has to jump, makes any sense to you?

Zz.
 
ZapperZ said:
But think about it. Your "F" is nothing more than the weight of the horse. It ends up being a constant, no matter how high the horse has to jump, because your "equation" doesn't take this into account. The "x" is the displacement of the "spring", i.e. the horse's leg/muscles since you are modeling it as a spring. This is not the height it has to jump. So, does the fact that your F remains constant, no matter how high the horse has to jump, makes any sense to you?

Zz.

Lets not consider the jump yet. If we are looking at determining the spring constant k, the force on the spring and the displacement are proportional. If we increase the force, we increase the displacement on the spring (x), right? In determining k, can't we use the displacement between a leg at rest (non-weight bearing) and the leg under the force of its weight. The difference in x (and there is one) is a result of the force of the horse's weight. We aren't even looking at the jump yet. Once she knows the spring constant, can she use the spring constant and the changes in displacement that occur as you alter jump height to determine the PE? Can't she look at the Potential Energy by measuring the varying displacements that occur as she alters jump height? Let's say the displacement on the spring is 0.05m for a 2' jump and 0.08 for a 4' jump. Knowing the spring constant is constant, and by measuring displacement, can she use PE = 1/2 k * x squared to determine how the horse compresses the spring in his tendons to handle varying jump heights?
and thank you ZapperZ for taking the time to allow me to hash this out with you! I really am appreciating this!
 
Liz Hoyt said:
Lets not consider the jump yet. If we are looking at determining the spring constant k, the force on the spring and the displacement are proportional. If we increase the force, we increase the displacement on the spring (x), right? In determining k, can't we use the displacement between a leg at rest (non-weight bearing) and the leg under the force of its weight. The difference in x (and there is one) is a result of the force of the horse's weight. We aren't even looking at the jump yet. Once she knows the spring constant, can she use the spring constant and the changes in displacement that occur as you alter jump height to determine the PE? Can't she look at the Potential Energy by measuring the varying displacements that occur as she alters jump height? Let's say the displacement on the spring is 0.05m for a 2' jump and 0.08 for a 4' jump. Knowing the spring constant is constant, and by measuring displacement, can she use PE = 1/2 k * x squared to determine how the horse compresses the spring in his tendons to handle varying jump heights?

I don't understand. What ULTIMATELY is to be determined here? The "spring constant", or the height that the horse can jump? I.e. what are the given or known variables?

I read your first post, and I get the impression that you know the height that the horse has to jump, or can jump, and so you want to find the spring constant, i.e. what is essentially the property of the horse's muscle. If I'm right in my interpretation, than using the Hooke's law force is "working too hard" (to paraphrase Mary Boas from the book). Sticking only with the potential energy will be sufficient, as I've outlined in my post.

If not, then you have to explain clearly what exactly is being calculated or estimated here.

Zz.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
3K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 17 ·
Replies
17
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
29
Views
3K
  • · Replies 17 ·
Replies
17
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
12K
  • · Replies 20 ·
Replies
20
Views
4K