Can Coherent E and B Fields Produce Visible Light in a Box?

Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the feasibility of generating visible light within a hypothetical device designed to create coherent electric and magnetic fields. Participants explore the theoretical implications of such a setup, including the necessary conditions and limitations related to frequency and material properties.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Technical explanation
  • Debate/contested

Main Points Raised

  • One participant proposes a device shaped like a box with copper and iron plates to generate electric and magnetic fields at visible light frequencies.
  • Another participant argues that the proposed setup resembles an antenna but doubts its capability to operate at visible light frequencies due to high impedance issues.
  • A different participant suggests that the discussion is a thought experiment, implying that technical limitations can be overlooked for the sake of exploration.
  • Some participants note that materials like copper and iron may not respond quickly enough to achieve the desired frequencies.
  • One participant expresses excitement about the potential for creating light sources with high bandwidth and resolution if the technical challenges could be overcome.
  • Another participant explains that a variable electric field can induce a magnetic field, referencing Ampere-Maxwell's Law and Faraday's Law to describe the generation of electromagnetic waves.
  • There is a suggestion that using both electric and magnetic fields could provide increased control over the electromagnetic vector of the emitted photons.
  • However, a later reply questions the coherence of the two fields, stating that they would form independent electromagnetic waves rather than a coherent output.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express differing views on the feasibility of generating visible light with the proposed setup, with some emphasizing technical limitations while others focus on theoretical possibilities. No consensus is reached regarding the practicality of the concept.

Contextual Notes

Limitations include assumptions about material responsiveness, the coherence of the generated fields, and the dependence on specific frequency ranges that may not be achievable with the proposed materials.

trini
Messages
216
Reaction score
1
Ok so I was wondering, let's say I have a device (eg., shaped like a toothpaste box with the two square ends cut off). I make 2 of the opposite faces from copper plate and the other 2 from iron plate (for example). I then generate an electric field in the box with the copper plates, and a magnetic field from the iron plates. If I pulse both the E and B fields at visible light frequency, will the result be visible light in the box?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
What you are basically constructing is an antenna. I don't believe there are any antennas capable of generating/receiving frequencies as high as visible light. Your setup would probably have VERY high impedance for frequencies that high, so it wouldn't work.

The 'fastest' antenas we have are 'nanotube' antennas, which are effective in the terahertz (10^12 Hz), which is still much lower than visible light (10^15 Hz).
 
its a thought experiment, assume we get past technical issues.
 
Okay, but you still mention copper/iron, which wouldn't react fast enough to an applied voltage to achieve these frequencies. :rolleyes:

But, if you could construct some antenna which can achieve frequencies high enough, you would see light.
 
thats awesome, it means if we ever get there we can have light sources with incredible bandwidth and resolution. photochemistry would never be the same.
 
You don't need a separate magnetic field source. A variable electric field induces a magnetic field, according to Ampere-Maxwell's Law, which in integral form is:
<br /> \oint_{C}{\vec{B} \cdot d\vec{\mathcal{l}}} = \frac{1}{c^2} \, \frac{\partial}{\partial t} \left( \, \iint_{S}{(\vec{E} \cdot \hat{n}) \, da} \right) + \mu_0 \, I<br />
where C is a closed contour with a line element d\vec{\mathcal{l}}, and S is any surface subtended on the contour C with a unit normal \hat{n}. I is the total (convective) electric current passing through the contour C.

In vacuum, the convective current I is zero, but the displacement current (the first term on the r.h.s. containing a time derivative of the electric flux) is usually large due to a rapidly oscillating field.

This (osillating) magnetic field, in turn, generates additional electric fields, according to Faraday's Law:
<br /> \oint_{C}{\vec{E} \cdot d\vec{\mathcal{l}}} = -\frac{\partial}{\partial t} \left( \iint_{S}{(\vec{B} \cdot \hat{n}) \, da}\right)<br />

This is essentially the mechanism for emitting electromagnetic waves that propagate freely in space away from the initial source of the oscillating electric field.

However, as mentioned by other posters, the frequency of electromagnetic waves generated by this mechanism is limited to frequencies that correspond to a wavelength comparable to the linear dimensions of the circuit elements.
 
indeed, the only reason i suggest both is to have increased control over the photon's EM vector
 
trini said:
indeed, the only reason i suggest both is to have increased control over the photon's EM vector

But, you will not have because the two fields will be incoherent, thus forming independent electromagnetic waves.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
1K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
5
Views
4K
  • · Replies 26 ·
Replies
26
Views
3K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
3K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
1K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K