Can Complex Network Physics Revolutionize Systems Biology and Other Fields?

AI Thread Summary
Complex network physics shows potential for revolutionizing systems biology and other fields, though its development is still in early stages. The application of network modeling in epidemiology and social sciences has been noted, but further exploration is needed. Thermoeconomics is mentioned as an intriguing area, though its validity and connection to networks remain uncertain. Interest in biological network inference is growing, particularly in DNA regulation networks. Overall, the field holds promise for diverse applications, especially in understanding complex biological systems.
pjmarshall
Messages
10
Reaction score
2
Haven't really seen much discussion about this field, but it seems interesting. It appears to have some promise in systems biology, but what about in other fields? What kind of material will arise from this field? Is thermoeconomics mostly pseudoscience, or just undeveloped?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Check out Mark Newman at UMich: http://www-personal.umich.edu/~mejn/

Network modeling is used in epidemiology and social sciences to some effect but I think it's on the low end of the development curve still.

Hadn't heard of "thermoeconomics". Looks like it might be interesting. But I didn't see any connection to networks...
 
Thanks for the link. (personally) I'm specifically looking at its applications to biology.
 

Thread '1:1 versus 2:1 Mechanical Advantage debate'

The rope is tied into the person (the load of 200 pounds) and the rope goes up from the person to a fixed pulley and back down to his hands. He hauls the rope to suspend himself in the air. What is the mechanical advantage of the system? The person will indeed only have to lift half of his body weight (roughly 100 pounds) because he now lessened the load by that same amount. This APPEARS to be a 2:1 because he can hold himself with half the force, but my question is: is that mechanical...
View full post »

Thread 'Newton's first law?'

Some physics textbook writer told me that Newton's first law applies only on bodies that feel no interactions at all. He said that if a body is on rest or moves in constant velocity, there is no external force acting on it. But I have heard another form of the law that says the net force acting on a body must be zero. This means there is interactions involved after all. So which one is correct?
View full post »
Thread 'Beam on an inclined plane'

Thread 'Beam on an inclined plane'

Hello! I have a question regarding a beam on an inclined plane. I was considering a beam resting on two supports attached to an inclined plane. I was almost sure that the lower support must be more loaded. My imagination about this problem is shown in the picture below. Here is how I wrote the condition of equilibrium forces: $$ \begin{cases} F_{g\parallel}=F_{t1}+F_{t2}, \\ F_{g\perp}=F_{r1}+F_{r2} \end{cases}. $$ On the other hand...
View full post »

Similar threads

Thoughts on neural networks "discovering" physical concepts
Replies
6
Views
1K
Programs What are some good graduate programs in the Physics of Complex Systems?
Replies
1
Views
2K
New Member Introduction - JD Longmire
Replies
2
Views
206
B Relativity and Biological Aging: How Time Dilation Slows Cell Activity
Replies
14
Views
1K
Biological Info: Understanding & Analyzing
Replies
15
Views
3K
B What are complex numbers good for?
Replies
13
Views
2K
Thoughts on neural networks "discovering" physical concepts
Replies
1
Views
1K
Crackpot Philosophy from the Swamp: An Ontological view of Fields in QFT.
Replies
3
Views
235
Former specialist who was forced to be a generalist by life....
Replies
2
Views
374
Physics, energy and sustainability research
Replies
1
Views
613

Hot Threads

Recent Insights

Back
Top