Can Computers Have Human Rights? Explaining Consciousness Through Numbers

  • Thread starter Thread starter shaneshnarayan
  • Start date Start date
shaneshnarayan
Messages
1
Reaction score
0
My class requires that I write an essay posed by the question can computers have human rights and the way I think I'm going to go about this is try to explain how everything can explained through numbers even our consciousness and if I can explain this then I can argue how computers should have human rights because are we not a computer ourselves. I can't seem to find any good explanations about how consciousness is number, could someone explain that concept to me?
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
shaneshnarayan said:
I can't seem to find any good explanations about how consciousness is number ...

Did it occur to you that maybe you can't find any discussion of this because it isn't true?
 
That is too philosophical for this forum.

An idea how to start:
I would try to argue with physical objects, not mathematical objects. It is clear that the brain has a physical location, and physical processes (activity of neurons) contribute to consciousness.
Artificial consciousnessat Wikipedia gives a good introduction.
 
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...
Fermat's Last Theorem has long been one of the most famous mathematical problems, and is now one of the most famous theorems. It simply states that the equation $$ a^n+b^n=c^n $$ has no solutions with positive integers if ##n>2.## It was named after Pierre de Fermat (1607-1665). The problem itself stems from the book Arithmetica by Diophantus of Alexandria. It gained popularity because Fermat noted in his copy "Cubum autem in duos cubos, aut quadratoquadratum in duos quadratoquadratos, et...
Thread 'Imaginary pythagorus'
I posted this in the Lame Math thread, but it's got me thinking. Is there any validity to this? Or is it really just a mathematical trick? Naively, I see that i2 + plus 12 does equal zero2. But does this have a meaning? I know one can treat the imaginary number line as just another axis like the reals, but does that mean this does represent a triangle in the complex plane with a hypotenuse of length zero? Ibix offered a rendering of the diagram using what I assume is matrix* notation...
Back
Top