Can Differentials and Errors be Split in Calculus?

  • Context: Undergrad 
  • Thread starter Thread starter KingBigness
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Differentials Errors
Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the concept of splitting derivatives in calculus, particularly in the context of differentials and errors. Participants explore the definitions and implications of differentials, the existence of dx and dy, and their roles in calculus, without reaching a consensus on the nature of these concepts.

Discussion Character

  • Debate/contested
  • Technical explanation
  • Conceptual clarification

Main Points Raised

  • Some participants argue that dx does not exist as a separate entity and is merely a notation, while others assert that dx does exist and can be used meaningfully in expressions like dy=f'(x)dx.
  • One participant suggests that the ratio of the two derivatives represents the derivative of the function, questioning whether this constitutes 'splitting' the derivative.
  • Another participant compares the notion of differentials to fractions, emphasizing that differentials can help understand how multiple variables change independently.
  • It is noted that different definitions of differentials may lead to confusion, particularly in the context of the implicit function theorem.
  • One participant discusses the relationship between the tangent space and the curve, suggesting that the projection of the curve is a linear function of the differentials, which approximates the curve near a point.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants do not reach a consensus on whether dx and dy exist as separate entities or are merely notational. Multiple competing views remain regarding the interpretation and application of differentials in calculus.

Contextual Notes

Participants highlight that definitions of differentials can vary depending on the context, and there may be limitations in understanding their roles without considering specific coordinate choices or the nature of the functions involved.

KingBigness
Messages
94
Reaction score
0
I asked a question a few weeks ago about 'splitting' the derivative. The thread can be found https://www.physicsforums.com/showthread.php?p=3581188#post3581188"

The answer to why it can not be split is because dx does not exist, it is simple a notation and not a fraction.

However, I just started Differentials and Errors, and the paper I read said.

The ratio of the two derivatives is actually the derivative of the function.

[itex]f'(x)=\frac{dy}{dx}[/itex]

and the relationship between the two differentials can be given by

[itex]dy=f'(x)dx[/itex]

Is this not 'splitting' the derivative?

Thank you
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Physics news on Phys.org
dx does exist and dy=f′(x)dx is fine

The actual definitions in use can very and sometimes confusion can arise. Often the implicit function theorem and its conditions are in play.
 
KingBigness said:
The answer to why it can not be split is because dx does not exist, it is simple a notation and not a fraction.The ratio of the two derivatives is actually the derivative of the function.
[itex]f'(x)=\frac{dy}{dx}[/itex]

and the relationship between the two differentials can be given by
[itex]dy=f'(x)dx[/itex]

Is this not 'splitting' the derivative?
I think you mean the ratio of two differentials , yes you are right , dy and dx are merely notations , and don't exist separately but when you write [itex]dy=f'(x)dx[/itex] , dy becomes function of variables x and dx , and meaningful when used together as in the case of dy/dx , also see the following link
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Differential_of_a_function"
 
Last edited by a moderator:
That is like saying 3/4 is merely a notation and 3 and 4 do not exist separately.
The advantage of differentials is when we have several variable we can understand how each changes with the others independent of the representation as differentials are invariant. dy/dx means the same thing if we have
y=f(x)
x=g(y)
h(x,y)=0
w(u(x,y),v(x,y))=0
and so on
it would be quite limiting to say dy/dx=f'(x) the end, if we change variables we will start from scratch.
 
lurflurf said:
That is like saying 3/4 is merely a notation and 3 and 4 do not exist separately.
The advantage of differentials is when we have several variable we can understand how each changes with the others independent of the representation as differentials are invariant. dy/dx means the same thing if we have
y=f(x)
x=g(y)
h(x,y)=0
w(u(x,y),v(x,y))=0
and so on
it would be quite limiting to say dy/dx=f'(x) the end, if we change variables we will start from scratch.
well said ! , But i don't say dy/dx is merely a notation , tell me what's dx ? ( without talking anything about dy)
 
Again different definitions of differential are used in different contexts so this is for the purpose of regular calculus
dx is just some variable for an arbitrary change in x
which is not the most interesting part
given some sufficiently well-behaved curve or relationship of variables we can define a tangent space that depends upon the point and the curve at that point, but in no way depends upon specific coordinate choices. The projection of the curve is a linear function of the differentials and approximates the curve well near the point.
thus
f(x+dx)-f(x) is some function of x and dx
and
f'(x)dx is some function of x and dx
they do not agree in general only approximately near x

This only works so well for total differentials of first order.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
3K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
2K
  • · Replies 49 ·
2
Replies
49
Views
8K
  • · Replies 15 ·
Replies
15
Views
2K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
2K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
2K
  • · Replies 22 ·
Replies
22
Views
4K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K